Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sgt_Schultze
No disgraced is only a word used as a descriptive adjective in front of Republicans names.

disgraced President Nixon
disgraced Abramoff
disgraced Cunningham;

now I agree that disgraced would fit fine in front of Clinton. We need to suggest that to the fine journalist who wrote this story. I'm sure they will want to be consistent and welcome our feedback.
15 posted on 03/03/2006 2:56:59 PM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Patriot from Philly
From the article:
"For the better part of a decade, Cunningham, in effect, erected a 'for sale' sign upon our nation's capital."


The very same thing (and much worse) could be said about Bill Clinton in the White House. I wonder if some of these reporters ever notice the breath taking hypocrisy. More importantly, I wonder when the deathocrats will.
25 posted on 03/03/2006 3:15:28 PM PST by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot from Philly

The people don't think that Clinton was "disgraced." To paraphrase Rosalyn Carter, "Clinton makes people comfortable with their own sinfulness."


41 posted on 03/03/2006 5:07:12 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson