Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
You misunderstood. One can be a General that is cold when makig battlefield decisions, and still be honorable. Grant had honor.

Yeah, I know. You said that. You've made it clear that in your opinion Grant was an honorable butcher who didn't give a damn for the lives of his men. Though what you think that qualified is going to do to change the over-all theme of your posts is beyond me.

896 posted on 03/24/2006 2:56:59 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

NS...

I think you are quite intelligent enough to get my meaning.
Grant was a perfect modern General in every sense of the word. Lee was trained and bred in a style of warfare that died with the advent of the rifled gun. Lee would not do what Grant & Sherman did to achieve victory. He would not make war on civilians, and therefore was unable to break the will of the north, like Sherman did to the South during his March thru Georgia. Total warfare was not in his comprehension. The only Confederate Officers that had foresight in those tactics were Longstreet & maybe N.B. Forrest. If Lee had carried out a scorched earth policy and invaded the North in 1861, instead of fighting a defensive war, things might have been different.


901 posted on 03/24/2006 10:02:46 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson