when you have essentially unlimited numbers of men,a HUGE industrial/manufacturing infrastructure, unlimited money & supplies AND are willing to win AT ANY PRICE (including closing your eyes to TENS of THOUSANDS of WAR CRIMES against UNarmed civilians), you don't have to be much of a general to win a war against a small, poor, under-supplied military force, no matter how motivated, brave or well-led.
free dixie,sw.
when you have essentially unlimited numbers of men,a HUGE industrial/manufacturing infrastructure, unlimited money & supplies AND are willing to win AT ANY PRICE (including closing your eyes to TENS of THOUSANDS of WAR CRIMES against UNarmed civilians), you don't have to be much of a general to win a war against a small, poor, under-supplied military force, no matter how motivated, brave or well-led. The gist of that farrago of southron blather, near as I can tell, is the admission that Lee and the south did not care enough about their cause to do what it took to win. Right?