[gaspar]

This is an article without sources. In other words, it is an opinion piece written by a long-time Democrat with a bone to pick. Is it any wonder that journalists are now reated below used car salesmen in their believability?

[Puppage]

his Texas-style shoot-first-ask-questions-later approach to complex problems

Shoot first, hmm?

[Candor7]

"An old acquaintance in Washington - a former member of Republican administrations whose foreign policy views are decidedly hard-line - recently had this to say to a friend about the Bush administration: This might be the most inept administration in American history."

Translation: A composite character made up of all the flatulance I have managed to remember callused into someone I remember as a hard liner Republican. While looking at this image in a mirror I heard him say that the Bush Administration is the most inept in the history of the country for not allowing formerly appointed Clinton bureaucrats from altering presidential policies across the board."

This is not ineptitude.

It is the President of the United States following the mandate given to him by the electorate,doing the best he can in the circumstances.

As a result, George W. Bush will be remembered as one of the great presidents. He will not need a presidential library full of lies that attempt to rewrite history, and will leave the American people a legacy of valor in the face of a democratic movement of raging maniacs lusting for power, without coherent principles or meaning.

This difference is obvious to the Amrican people:

[Paulus Invictus]

Not to mention that they cite the bogus CBS poll that is as useless as this article.