Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Poll
CNN | CNN

Posted on 03/02/2006 4:04:09 PM PST by ruschpa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Patriot from Philly

Completely agree... unfortunately, what has the most effect on his numbers is the Iraqi carnage shown on the daily news day after day, whether or not it is true.
Things like the port deal were just incompetence from some staff members...


21 posted on 03/02/2006 4:11:38 PM PST by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa

I think the ports deal is a non-story, but the White House has been terrible about dealing with it. As a matter of fact, they are lousy in PR period. It doesn't help that the channels of mass media are for the most part allied against him, but even allowing for that the WH PR staff should be ashamed. And Bush should fire the lot of them.


22 posted on 03/02/2006 4:12:18 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

what is the cycle of a poll? Right after a Bush lied mantra? Weekly?


23 posted on 03/02/2006 4:12:38 PM PST by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa
" So you don't think his ratings have taken a hit these past couple of weeks?"

Yes, but by 5 points. Down from 48 to 43. This is verified by both Rasmussen and Battleground . You are posting opposition crap.

24 posted on 03/02/2006 4:12:55 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa
What I want to know is why people disapprove of him. That means everything. For example, a person can disapprove of the way President Bush is handling Iraq. They might be disapproving because they think we need to get out of Iraq immediately or they migth be disapproving because they think we need another 100,000 troops and to start rolling into Iran, too. That's two totally different things.
25 posted on 03/02/2006 4:13:02 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
And all have oversampled Democrats by 10% or better.
26 posted on 03/02/2006 4:13:35 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Pat Buchanan lost a family member in the holocaust. The man fell out of a guard tower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Well, if Bush wants to get anything done in his second term, he'll need a Republican Congress. His poor poll numbers have a direct effect on the mid term elections. If he loses Congress, expect multiple administration investigations and impeachment charges.


27 posted on 03/02/2006 4:13:35 PM PST by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

lol Not even this Bushbot believes that. Wishful thinkin though.


28 posted on 03/02/2006 4:13:56 PM PST by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa

With DemocRATS out there all over the place telling the MSM that they are "Republicans who voted for Bush," I can't believe anyone would take MSM "polls" seriously anymore.


29 posted on 03/02/2006 4:14:09 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
No they don't. See #24
30 posted on 03/02/2006 4:14:10 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa
I saw the media play this game where they block for the Democrats in several elections: in 2002, they tried to play the stock market and corporate corruption; in 2004-they were disgraceful.

They've been beating up on Bush since the election day and have successfully brought down his poll numbers, a major goal.

Either the Administration is baiting the media into behavior that totally discredits and neutralizes them in the election, or, they are clueless.

I've suggested for months that we take away the poll game by putting out that conservatives are not cooperating with the polls.
31 posted on 03/02/2006 4:16:03 PM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly
He needs to turn it around fast.

No, HE is fighting a way. The republicans in congress, who are supposed to be guarding his back, instead are busy shoving a knife into it. That d*mn Snowe with her vicious little committee, all the other so called republicans, are running for cover instead of standing and fighting.

32 posted on 03/02/2006 4:16:05 PM PST by McGavin999 (I suggest the UAE form a Joint Venture Partnership with Halliburton & Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa

Foxnews had him at 39 for their poll. Which means he's doing just fine.


33 posted on 03/02/2006 4:17:38 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

I didn't realize Battleground had a poll out.


34 posted on 03/02/2006 4:17:38 PM PST by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Rasmussen is excellent BUMP!


35 posted on 03/02/2006 4:19:09 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I take that one back. It’s early February


36 posted on 03/02/2006 4:19:23 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa
You do realize that his poll numbers will have a direct effect on the mid terms elections in November, right?

You do realize that poll numbers arrived at with a 27% Republican sampling can't have a direct effect on when the 1st Lady will fart let alone the mid-term elections in November, right?

37 posted on 03/02/2006 4:21:33 PM PST by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Yeah, reminds me of a poll I was called for during Clinton's Impeachment. The question was "Would it change the way I voted in the last election, if I had known about the Monica affair." Since I didn't ever vote for Clinton, I said "No". I am sure that my vote was considered a positive for old Bill. Remember how his poll numbers kept climbing during impeachment?


38 posted on 03/02/2006 4:23:55 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yep. Another fake poll. We didn't get to FReep it.


39 posted on 03/02/2006 4:24:16 PM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa
The media chooses to report Iraq in a very strange way. They gleefully report casualties without context. And the media does sympathize with the enemy of the US.

Now, what I would like to discuss is a strategy to put the media on the defensive since they are clearly collaborating with the Democratic Party.

I think Bush gets in trouble when he goes wishy-washy. He is reluctant to take on the press, why?
40 posted on 03/02/2006 4:26:59 PM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson