Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZGuy

I don't disagree with the overall thrust of this article or with the last three points, but with regard to the first point that implies cohabiting makes divorce more likely I think that's bunk. What it reveals, in my view, is that the values of those who cohabit are already different from those who do not, and that these values predispose them to a greater likelihood of later divorce.


5 posted on 03/01/2006 7:14:05 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
Further, cohabiting relationships tend to be fragile and relatively short in duration; less than half of cohabiting relationships last five or more years. Typically, they last about 18 months.

Which, if they had married before moving in, would mean divorce. Kinda hurts that point.

13 posted on 03/01/2006 7:19:11 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

I agree that part 1 is bunk, but I think there's one factor they're neglecting to mention or ignorantly leaving out: this involves couples that cohabit IN LIEU of marriage.

I've lived with a girlfriend under the guise that we would have separate rooms and just see how we live together. The first few months involved sleeping in the same bed and lots of sex. The next few months involved a lot of weirdness. The last few months were just like we were friends and nothing more. It drained out of us, the novelty of living together, and we kinda realized that it was better to part ways.

If you live together as an alternative to marriage, I can definitely see how that would cause eventual "divorce." If it's innocent cohabiting to have another person helping to pay the bills, and there are no kids in the equation, I don't see a problem. If anything, it seems counterintuitive to say that cohabitation leads to divorce, but who am I to say their study is bunk. Hell, they keep saying a majority of Floridians want Rudy and McCain to run for pres... they don't ask me, cuz I'd never say that!


27 posted on 03/01/2006 7:33:40 AM PST by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

"I don't disagree with the overall thrust of this article or with the last three points, but with regard to the first point that implies cohabiting makes divorce more likely I think that's bunk. What it reveals, in my view, is that the values of those who cohabit are already different from those who do not, and that these values predispose them to a greater likelihood of later divorce"

I read an article a long time ago about why living together is not helpful towards establishing a marriage-worthy relationship.

The couple takes inventory of their "stuff".
Because they are not totally sure of the committment - they keep track of "what's mine"
Separate bank accounts - his and her cars.
Someone's bank account is going to be cushier than the other's so there will be resentment if payment of bills is not split evenly.
When there are fights - each one eyes their "mine" inventory of the stuff.
There is less incentive to work through rough patches.

If this couple goes on to get married, they are often entrenched in this "mine" "yours" mentality, and the wedding won't neccessarily cure them of that.

In contrast it is more common for couples who get married before they move in together to consider themselves a team.
They pool their money into joint accounts, and both names appear on them. They pool their stuff together and it becomes "ours". The committment to success is stronger - there is more incentive to work together rather than plan an exit strategy.

This was the gist of the article - it rang true to me as family and friends who lived together seemed to be pretty caught up in keeping track of what money and items they brought into the relationship.


31 posted on 03/01/2006 7:38:09 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Yep. Couldn't have put it better.


75 posted on 03/01/2006 8:23:47 AM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Interesting chicken/egg take.


119 posted on 03/01/2006 8:53:19 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson