[CharlesWayneCT]

So, who has proved to you that a "motivated Islamofascist working for" P&O company "would have no possible way of breaching security to allow bombs or other dangerous terrorist tools into the U.S"?

After all, if your disapproval of the deal is acheived, P&O will run the terminals. Terrorists have had 6 years to work on getting a plant into THAT company.

Opponents continue to compare this deal to some non-existant reality where all the ports are run by U.S. companies with workers that are sworn to loyalty to our country.

[oceanview]

let's take an example - Egypt Air.

a "solid company". did they have any security procedures to screen pilots? did the US impose such security screening requirements on them? apparently not. because a jihadi pilot managed to work his way into the being a captain without anyone knowing, and one day, he crashed his plane load full of people into the atlantic ocean.

could that have happened on El Al or British Airways? why not?

[Dr. Thorne]

So, we come full circle in the debate. Who is more likely to have people with terrorist sympathies? PO or DPW?

Oh, that's right. We can't suggest that because it's racist. At least, that's one of the Administration's talking points, isn't it? Used to be the Left that shut down discussion by screaming "racism".