Bush disagrees with South Dakota abortion ban

AFP ^ | 1 March 2006

[boomop1]

Well you must have mistaken me for some one who gives a shi*.

[clawrence3]

No one said we were forcing her to carry the baby - she just could not live in South Dakota and abort that baby, that's all.

[Dick Bachert]

According to the last stats I saw (and it's very tough to get any sort of accurate number), the rape and incest argument is bogus as less than 5% of those sorts of pregnancies are rape or incest caused.

The feminazis raised it to emotionalize the issue. In order to keep their bed-hopping "Sex and the City" lifestyle safe, they must preserve that final, after-the-fact method of disposing of an unwanted "cell mass" called abortion.

Must work: Bush fell for it.

[jdm]

"I'm talking about the feelings of the woman, not the baby."

I understand -- that was the point I was trying to make. All the attention seems to be focused on the woman, and the woman only.

[luckymom]

In the article you reference, maternal causes of death include "complications of unsafe abortion". Perhaps that is also the reason for the rise in pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. in the past 5 years, hmm?

[SwordofTruth]

If men carried babies, abortion would be paid for by the State.

You have a low opinion of men.

[jdm]

You can use the "s" word since you've been here so long. I see it here quite a bit. Just don't bold it. :)

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Bush. The new squishy 2006 model. All he needs now is an adequate supply of white flags.

[frankiep]

I did not change subjects.

I asked you if killing children because of the crimes of someone else is right.

You replied that it is legal.

I replied that slavery and segregation were legal too. Meaning that just because something is legal doesn't make it right.

That is NOT changing the subject.

[lesser_satan]

Cold, hard fact of life is that babies get sold every day in this country.Are you suggesting that we sell the baby on the black market and give the proceeds to the mother in return for carrying the baby?

[eeevil conservative]

I've noticed many of these women don't really want to talk to me about this! LOL!

they find it much easier to attack men....

[clawrence3]

I (finally) agree with you - I think it is clear Scalia would not impose a federal ban on all abortions - I doubt Chief Justice Roberts would either.

[muawiyah]

Just telling you that it goes on.

Amazing isn't it? Rather than killing their kids some mother sell them.

[BigSkyFreeper]

No one said we were forcing her to carry the baby

By abolishing abortion your forcing her to.

[eeevil conservative]

ain't THAT the truth...

[Jorge]

I can't imagine many freepers being upset about the president's statements. Only those who are looking for something to be upset about.

I don't agree with the president's statements on this, but don't find them totally unreasonable either.

I can see where a woman may not want to carry a child who is the result of rape or incest.

[Ann Archy]

There would be a SPECIAL place in heaven to the woman that gives life to a child after being raped.....the same place in heaven where mothers that die in childbirth......total selflessness.........SAINTHOOD.

[clawrence3]

The child did nothing wrong - do I need to explain "justifiable homicide" again to you?

[BigSkyFreeper]

I replied that slavery and segregation were legal too.

I replied that slavery and segregation wasn't federal law, but state rights. Roe v. Wade is federal law and not state rights. I believe states should decide, not the federal government.

[jdm]

"You have a low opinion of men."

Wow -- very insightful.