Skip to comments.
Bush disagrees with South Dakota abortion ban
AFP ^
| 1 March 2006
Posted on 02/28/2006 6:36:43 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,061-1,073 next last
I could be wrong, but President Bush seems to be going out of his way to antagonize his base this past week or so...
To: Aussie Dasher
In the case of rape, it's usually the perpetrator who wants the abortion. The victims want to have the child, and it's usually their only way out of the situation. The perpetrator wants to "destroy the evidence." It's great we are so sensitive to the needs of those who commit incest.
2
posted on
02/28/2006 6:38:58 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: Aussie Dasher
I don't suppose it occurs to you that Bush has done nothing wrong. Rape and incest and the life of the mother?
Freeper. Please.
3
posted on
02/28/2006 6:39:19 PM PST
by
Reactionary
(The Moonbats Need an Enema)
To: Aussie Dasher
I'm sorry, I know how alot of you feel, but to make a woman carry a baby conceived from rape is so incredibly wrong.
4
posted on
02/28/2006 6:39:23 PM PST
by
Hildy
(The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
To: Aussie Dasher
"...President Bush seems to be going out of his way to antagonize his base this past week or so..."
The last week?
Bush has been bashing his base ... at least since he was reelected.
To: Aussie Dasher
The sad thing is im afraid your right...... Man needs to wake up.
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Hildy
And killing a baby isn't?
8
posted on
02/28/2006 6:40:45 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: nickcarraway
In the case of rape, it's usually the perpetrator who wants the abortion. The victims want to have the child, and it's usually their only way out of the situation.Seriously. That's a bizarre enough statement that I'd honestly like to know the reasoning behind it.
To: Hildy
I'm sorry, I know how alot of you feel, but to make a woman carry a baby conceived from rape is so incredibly wrong. I see, so you'd rather murder a child for the sins of his father.
To: nickcarraway
"The victims want to have the child"
Where the heck did you get the stats on that bold statment?
11
posted on
02/28/2006 6:41:18 PM PST
by
ndt
To: Aussie Dasher
Why are you against abortion in case of insect or rape?
12
posted on
02/28/2006 6:41:25 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Hildy
Actually, if ya' jus' gotta' kill somebody why not take the rapist out and execute him.
13
posted on
02/28/2006 6:41:27 PM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: jveritas
It's not the baby's fault. Why should he or she be executed for the crimes of another?
14
posted on
02/28/2006 6:42:36 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Aussie Dasher
I can't imagine many freepers being upset about the president's statements. Only those who are looking for something to be upset about.
16
posted on
02/28/2006 6:43:32 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Hildy
You're right, killing an innocent child is much better. /sarc
17
posted on
02/28/2006 6:43:44 PM PST
by
frankiep
To: Hildy
We are back to choice thing, I guess it is one's own opinion if a living child is being carried, but of course it is the child's fault.
18
posted on
02/28/2006 6:43:52 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: Aussie Dasher
Is there really an epidemic of people being impregnated by incestual sex? I know it happens, but I don't see why such an extreme example is always brought up - as if people who get abortions do so with great reservation and take it so seriously... In reality, abortion has been made into something that is a viable guilt-free option for unwanted babies.
To: Aussie Dasher
Bush is completely right in this, though maybe not for the reasons some think.
Coming out this way, with a law that will be crushed, will merely paint us as extremists. I know people don't like to hear that but it's true--this is just the type of law that makes moderates go "See? They're all extremists!"
20
posted on
02/28/2006 6:44:42 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,061-1,073 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson