Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nitro

Allowing homosexual men to lead Boy Scouts is absolutely the same as allowing a man to lead a pack of Girl Scouts. Now, if the Boy Scouts allowed lesbians to run the Boy Scouts, well then, that would be alright as nothing would happen. It would also be o.k. for gay men to lead the girl scouts as nothing would happen there as well. I don't care if gays are in the scouts- they just have to be in opposite gender camps.


22 posted on 02/28/2006 3:30:47 PM PST by scuba - doo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: scuba - doo

You are wrong, girl scouts have embraced gay leaders and the Boy Scouts have not.

If you are gay, fine, but let some of us straight people to live as well..


24 posted on 02/28/2006 3:47:56 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: scuba - doo
Now, if the Boy Scouts allowed lesbians to run the Boy Scouts, well then, that would be alright as nothing would happen.

Wrong. Lesbians seem to fall into two types. The "men are evil and I hate them bitter shrew" type and the "gay is best for everyone so I'll recruit" type. Exposure of children to either is child abuse.

Scoutmasters should be real men who can teach the boys how to be real men. Not girlymen poofters. How can a lesbian teach a boy how to be a proper husband, father, provider? She can't.

The third law of homosexuality:

Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse

35 posted on 03/01/2006 5:59:31 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson