Skip to comments.
Amid dispute, Bush still backs Dubai ports deal
Reuters ^
| 2/28/06
| Caren Bohan and Susan Cornwell
Posted on 02/28/2006 1:44:53 PM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Molly T.
Sorry, I wrote ports, but meant terminals.
41
posted on
02/28/2006 3:52:18 PM PST
by
Molly T.
To: Paul Ross
Always find it interesting that the same collection of Freepers who squeal loudest about "Bush's out of control spending" turn right around and continually find new parts of the Private Sector they want the Federal Govt to take over. My isn't this creeping National Socialism really something "Conservatives" should rally behind. What next? Have the Airline Terminals nationalized too? Cannot have those nasty foreigner flying over you Know Nothings heads!!! How about those nasty old trucking firms since they hire Canadian and Mexican drivers? And YOU KNOW we cannot risk having those oil wells run by private firms out in the Gulf! There there are those Refineries. OH yeah, those are huge bombs waiting to go off. Man, just NO end of security risks all around you Know Nothings isn't there?
42
posted on
02/28/2006 3:52:34 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
To: Paul Ross
There has to be some other 'plum' we can give the UAE to keep them happy.My thoughts exactly.
The other two issues I have with this is:
1. The message it sends our soldiers, and
2. Why wasn't a law passed on 9/12 that would require Homeland Security (at least!) approval of any deal involving transfers of ownership of ports, airports, etc.
To: MNJohnnie
...Freepers who squeal loudest about "Bush's out of control spending" turn right around and continually find new parts of the Private Sector they want the Federal Govt to take over. Pardon me, time for yet another reality check her. The shoe is on the other foot. It is you who are cavalierly justifying a foreign government's takeover of a private enterprise. You who are willingly undermining free enterprise.
44
posted on
02/28/2006 4:00:59 PM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
To: UCANSEE2
"Power", that's what this is all about. The DemocRATS want to get power away from the Republicans. And, some Republicans are all too willing to give it to them. Would someone please put a sock in the mouth of Sen. Susan Collins? What a dweeb.
To: Kimberly GG
46
posted on
02/28/2006 5:03:04 PM PST
by
GeorgeW23225
("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.")
To: Paul Ross
The conservatives were the first to raise the red flags on the issues. I was unaware that Chuck Schumer was a conservative...or HRC for that matter. You should start thinking about how you're going to climb back off that limb...or should we call the Fire Dept?
47
posted on
02/28/2006 5:10:06 PM PST
by
mac_truck
( Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
To: Paul Ross
"On the basis of our inquiry we assessed that the threat to U.S. national security posed by DP World to be low." He's admitting there is a threat, but it's low.
I don't think you win a lot of support by saying there is a threat, low or otherwise.
48
posted on
02/28/2006 5:37:04 PM PST
by
isrul
To: plain talk
Yeah, in New Jersey, I think. Probably other places too.
49
posted on
02/28/2006 5:39:57 PM PST
by
isrul
To: em2vn
links? No. Just my feeble memory from those days. It was posted here at Free Republic. Maybe others have the details. Sorry.
To: Kjobs
UAE voting record with the US: 12.5% in 2004, 0% in 2003, 17.6% in 2002, 0% in 2001, 30.0% in 2000.
At the same time, Israel has voted with the US: 100% in 2004, 92.9% in 2003, 92.6% in 2002, 100% in 2001, 96.2% in 2000.
51
posted on
02/28/2006 10:37:18 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
To: Kimberly GG
>>
"If there was any doubt in my mind or people in my administration's minds that our ports would be less secure or the American people in danger, this deal wouldn't go forward," Bush said" This is EXACTLY why I voted for Bush!!!! Staying the course and making me proud! <<
Well, I guess you do have to give credit to Bush for being consistant -- unlike the John Kerryesque wing of FR (and Bill Frist) who voted against handing over our ports to Dupai... before they voted for it.
52
posted on
02/28/2006 11:36:45 PM PST
by
BillyBoy
(Find out the TRUTH about the liberal Democrat's FAVORITE Republican in IL ... www.nopinka.com)
To: proud American in Canada
It must be really cold where you are.
It's been said probably close to 1,000 times now.
THE PORT DEAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP.
53
posted on
03/01/2006 12:21:10 AM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
To: proud American in Canada
It must be really cold where you are.
It's been said probably close to 1,000 times now.
THE PORT DEAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP.
54
posted on
03/01/2006 12:21:10 AM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
To: proud American in Canada
How many times do you have to be told?
NO PORTS NOR APIRPORTS ARE BEING SOLD!
To: UCANSEE2
56
posted on
03/01/2006 6:47:46 AM PST
by
Blzbba
(Sub sole nihil novi est)
To: UCANSEE2
"After 9/11 and the USS Cole, the UAE provided us with info and helped us catch the conspirators. "
9/11 and the Cole were several years apart. UAE continued recognition of the Taliban and their ports were shipping points for nuclear weapons materials being sent to N. Korea and Pakistan, etc.
57
posted on
03/01/2006 6:48:55 AM PST
by
Blzbba
(Sub sole nihil novi est)
To: isrul
He's admitting there is a threat, but it's low. I don't think you win a lot of support by saying there is a threat, low or otherwise.Yes. The threat assessments need to be broken down, at the least in confidential sessions of Congress, explaining how they think they can circumvent the problem of jihadist infiltration.
58
posted on
03/01/2006 7:25:18 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
To: UCANSEE2
How many shipping container ports do they have on the US-Mexican border....muy mucho amigo...muy mucho
59
posted on
03/01/2006 9:38:48 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
To: joesnuffy
First, Thanks for the photo. Earth-Art. Beautiful.
Second, thanks for the info. So, how many and what companies manage them, and who provides security for those areas would be the questions the American Public should ask, before going off half-cocked on the change of overseas management staff due to a buyout.
The I in IBM doesn't stand for American.
60
posted on
03/01/2006 11:01:06 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(and miles to go before I sleep.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson