Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amid dispute, Bush still backs Dubai ports deal
Reuters ^ | 2/28/06 | Caren Bohan and Susan Cornwell

Posted on 02/28/2006 1:44:53 PM PST by Paul Ross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Molly T.

Sorry, I wrote ports, but meant terminals.


41 posted on 02/28/2006 3:52:18 PM PST by Molly T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Always find it interesting that the same collection of Freepers who squeal loudest about "Bush's out of control spending" turn right around and continually find new parts of the Private Sector they want the Federal Govt to take over. My isn't this creeping National Socialism really something "Conservatives" should rally behind. What next? Have the Airline Terminals nationalized too? Cannot have those nasty foreigner flying over you Know Nothings heads!!! How about those nasty old trucking firms since they hire Canadian and Mexican drivers? And YOU KNOW we cannot risk having those oil wells run by private firms out in the Gulf! There there are those Refineries. OH yeah, those are huge bombs waiting to go off. Man, just NO end of security risks all around you Know Nothings isn't there?
42 posted on 02/28/2006 3:52:34 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
There has to be some other 'plum' we can give the UAE to keep them happy.

My thoughts exactly.

The other two issues I have with this is:

1. The message it sends our soldiers, and

2. Why wasn't a law passed on 9/12 that would require Homeland Security (at least!) approval of any deal involving transfers of ownership of ports, airports, etc.

43 posted on 02/28/2006 3:54:07 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
...Freepers who squeal loudest about "Bush's out of control spending" turn right around and continually find new parts of the Private Sector they want the Federal Govt to take over.

Pardon me, time for yet another reality check her. The shoe is on the other foot. It is you who are cavalierly justifying a foreign government's takeover of a private enterprise. You who are willingly undermining free enterprise.

44 posted on 02/28/2006 4:00:59 PM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

"Power", that's what this is all about. The DemocRATS want to get power away from the Republicans. And, some Republicans are all too willing to give it to them. Would someone please put a sock in the mouth of Sen. Susan Collins? What a dweeb.


45 posted on 02/28/2006 4:37:34 PM PST by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Mega dittos!!!


46 posted on 02/28/2006 5:03:04 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
The conservatives were the first to raise the red flags on the issues.

I was unaware that Chuck Schumer was a conservative...or HRC for that matter. You should start thinking about how you're going to climb back off that limb...or should we call the Fire Dept?

47 posted on 02/28/2006 5:10:06 PM PST by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
"On the basis of our inquiry we assessed that the threat to U.S. national security posed by DP World to be low."

He's admitting there is a threat, but it's low.

I don't think you win a lot of support by saying there is a threat, low or otherwise.

48 posted on 02/28/2006 5:37:04 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Yeah, in New Jersey, I think. Probably other places too.


49 posted on 02/28/2006 5:39:57 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

links? No. Just my feeble memory from those days. It was posted here at Free Republic. Maybe others have the details. Sorry.


50 posted on 02/28/2006 7:10:16 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kjobs
UAE voting record with the US: 12.5% in 2004, 0% in 2003, 17.6% in 2002, 0% in 2001, 30.0% in 2000.

At the same time, Israel has voted with the US: 100% in 2004, 92.9% in 2003, 92.6% in 2002, 100% in 2001, 96.2% in 2000.

51 posted on 02/28/2006 10:37:18 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
>> "If there was any doubt in my mind or people in my administration's minds that our ports would be less secure or the American people in danger, this deal wouldn't go forward," Bush said" This is EXACTLY why I voted for Bush!!!! Staying the course and making me proud! <<

Well, I guess you do have to give credit to Bush for being consistant -- unlike the John Kerryesque wing of FR (and Bill Frist) who voted against handing over our ports to Dupai... before they voted for it.

52 posted on 02/28/2006 11:36:45 PM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the liberal Democrat's FAVORITE Republican in IL ... www.nopinka.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

It must be really cold where you are.

It's been said probably close to 1,000 times now.


THE PORT DEAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP.


53 posted on 03/01/2006 12:21:10 AM PST by AmeriBrit (The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

It must be really cold where you are.

It's been said probably close to 1,000 times now.


THE PORT DEAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP.


54 posted on 03/01/2006 12:21:10 AM PST by AmeriBrit (The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
How many times do you have to be told?

NO PORTS NOR APIRPORTS ARE BEING SOLD!

55 posted on 03/01/2006 12:26:12 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"UAE works with Zim Co, which is an Israeli-owned company. Guess they don't boycott their products, huh?"


I dunno. You tell me:Dubai Ports World supports Israeli boycott
56 posted on 03/01/2006 6:47:46 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

"After 9/11 and the USS Cole, the UAE provided us with info and helped us catch the conspirators. "


9/11 and the Cole were several years apart. UAE continued recognition of the Taliban and their ports were shipping points for nuclear weapons materials being sent to N. Korea and Pakistan, etc.


57 posted on 03/01/2006 6:48:55 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: isrul
He's admitting there is a threat, but it's low. I don't think you win a lot of support by saying there is a threat, low or otherwise.

Yes. The threat assessments need to be broken down, at the least in confidential sessions of Congress, explaining how they think they can circumvent the problem of jihadist infiltration.

58 posted on 03/01/2006 7:25:18 AM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

How many shipping container ports do they have on the US-Mexican border....muy mucho amigo...muy mucho

59 posted on 03/01/2006 9:38:48 AM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

First, Thanks for the photo. Earth-Art. Beautiful.

Second, thanks for the info. So, how many and what companies manage them, and who provides security for those areas would be the questions the American Public should ask, before going off half-cocked on the change of overseas management staff due to a buyout.

The I in IBM doesn't stand for American.


60 posted on 03/01/2006 11:01:06 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (and miles to go before I sleep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson