Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Backs Abortion Protesters
Yahoo news ^
| 2/28/06
| TONI LOCY, AP
Posted on 02/28/2006 7:27:13 AM PST by conservatrice
Edited on 02/28/2006 8:38:19 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-195 next last
YAY
To: conservatrice
To: mainepatsfan
Don't know yet. All I saw was this article, posted 5 minutes ago.
To: conservatrice
A small win for the future unborn.
4
posted on
02/28/2006 7:28:51 AM PST
by
Raycpa
To: mainepatsfan
I just reloaded the article, and it says 8-0. Click the link for more.
To: conservatrice
The racketeering laws would be more correctly applied to the abortion providers.
To: conservatrice
So the even the pro abortion justices saw this was clearly unconstitutional.
To: conservatrice
Thank You!
Let freedom ring.
8
posted on
02/28/2006 7:33:27 AM PST
by
wmfights
(Lead, Follow, or get out of the Way!)
To: Coleus; cpforlife.org; NYer; Salvation; Convert from ECUSA
9
posted on
02/28/2006 7:33:59 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
(Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
To: conservatrice
And from the headline you can tell that Tony Locy, AP, sides with the pro-death crowd.
10
posted on
02/28/2006 7:34:19 AM PST
by
Alex Murphy
(Colossians 4:5)
To: conservatrice
8-0
the msm will still spin this as the Roberts court
11
posted on
02/28/2006 7:34:23 AM PST
by
wardaddy
("hillbilly car wash owner outta control")
To: conservatrice
Sweet Jebus the constitution wins for once!
12
posted on
02/28/2006 7:34:32 AM PST
by
trubluolyguy
(Freedom of choice? Choose to keep your damned legs closed.)
To: conservatrice
I see Breyer wrote the majority opinion. Did he cite the laws of Uzbekistan or Paraguay? Good decision though.
To: conservatrice; lightingguy; cpforlife.org
14
posted on
02/28/2006 7:36:57 AM PST
by
agrace
To: wardaddy
8-0? Did Alito sit it out?
15
posted on
02/28/2006 7:37:14 AM PST
by
Graymatter
(Not A Good German)
To: conservatrice
The Supreme Court dealt a setback Tuesday to abortion clinics Considering that this was over the use of anti-racketeering laws, it's interesting how the AP didn't call this a triumph for free expression, or at the very least a victory for the anti-abortion side. Not surprising, but interesting.
16
posted on
02/28/2006 7:38:39 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
To: marsh_of_mists
I loved it when Scalia pointed out that if you want to cite foreign law than the pro abortion crowd wouldn't find much help from over seas.
To: conservatrice
We lost another one, sisters!!
To: conservatrice
From the article:
The 8-0 decision ends a case that the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had kept alive despite a 2003 decision by the high court that lifted a nationwide injunction on anti-abortion groups led by Joseph Scheidler and others.
I wonder if Scalia voted or not, since he is so new, he may not have had time to side.
But it is more than likely that Ginsberg abstained from voting since she is a stauch pro-abortion supporter.
19
posted on
02/28/2006 7:39:33 AM PST
by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: Graymatter
don't know....8-0 was posted upstream
20
posted on
02/28/2006 7:39:42 AM PST
by
wardaddy
("hillbilly car wash owner outta control")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-195 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson