STRATEGERY: BUSH CHEERS DECLINE OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA, RISE OF ALTERNATIVE PRESS

drudgereport/strategery ^ | 2/28/2006 | drudge

[Geronimo]

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FEB 28, 2006 09:00:01 ET XXXXX

BUSH CHEERS DECLINE OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA, RISE OF ALTERNATIVE PRESS

**Exclusive**

ROVE SLAMS DAN RATHER: NOT A 'SERIOUS' REPORTER

President Bush, for the first time, is hailing the rise of the alternative media and the decline of the mainstream media, which he now says “conspired” to harm him with forged documents.

“I find it interesting that the old way of gathering the news is slowly but surely losing market share,” Bush said in an exclusive interview for the new book STRATEGERY. “It’s interesting to watch these media conglomerates try to deal with the realities of a new kind of world.”

[STRATEGERY was ranked #5 on AMAZON.COM's sales chart early Tuesday morning.]

For example, journalist Dan Rather left the anchor chair at CBS News after Internet reporters revealed he had used forged documents to criticize Bush’s military record in September 2004. The forgeries, which Bush now calls a conspiracy, ended up helping his reelection campaign, he acknowledged in the Oval Office interview.

“It looks like somebody conspired to float false documents,” the president tells author Bill Sammon. “And I was amazed about it. I just couldn’t believe that would be happening [and] then it would become the basis of a fairly substantial series of news stories.”

He added: “Then there was a backlash to it. I mean, a lot of people were angry that this could have happened. A lot of Americans are fair people and they viewed this as patently unfair. So in a funny way, I guess it inured to our benefit, when it was all said and done.”

The episode, known as “Memogate,” inoculated Bush against further scrutiny of his National Guard record for the duration of the presidential campaign.

“It also, frankly, gave us an opportunity, frequently, when things came out in the media that we didn’t believe or didn’t like, to say, ‘It’s another CBS story,’” said Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who was the president’s campaign manager. “I mean, it gave us a serious response to bad news.”

Although Memogate was initially expected to harm the president, it ended up backfiring spectacularly on the press.

“The guy that it hurt most was Dan Rather and the executives at CBS,” White House strategist Karl Rove said in an interview for STRATEGERY. “It further disgraced a network which is third in ratings and, if you look at the demographics of their consumers, it’s like 70 percent Democrat.”

Rove said Rather’s eagerness to broadcast obviously forged documents proves he is “no serious reporter.” As for Rather’s insistence, to this day, that the documents are real, Rove said: “That’s really bias.”

Memogate has helped accelerate the decline of the mainstream media, generally defined as CBS, NBC, ABC, The New York Times and other establishment news outlets.

“I think what’s healthy is that there’s no monopoly on the news,” Bush said. “There’s competition. There’s competition for the attention of, you know, 290 million people, or whatever it is.

“And the amazing thing about this world we live in is that there’s a kind of free-flowing, kind of bulletin board of ideas and thoughts out there in the ether space, sometimes landing on somebody’s desk and sometimes not, but always available. It’s a very interesting period.”

Having long been pilloried by the mainstream media, Bush now finds the rise of the alternative media nothing less than revolutionary.

“It’s the beginning of the twenty-first century; it also happens to be the beginning of—or near the beginning—of a revolution in newsgathering and dissemination,” he said. “Not in newsmaking—that tends to be pretty consistent.”

Rove considers Memogate a watershed in the rise of the alternative media.

“The whole incident in the fall of 2004 showed really the power of the 'blogosphere',” he said in his West Wing office.

“Because in essence you had now, an army of self-appointed experts looking over the shoulder of the mainstream media and bringing to bear enormously sophisticated skills,” he added.

Still, Rove cautioned that the Internet’s political potential has a darker side.

“There is so much ugliness and viciousness and fundamental untruths that the blogosphere transmits,” he lamented. “It also is a vehicle for ugly rumors, for scurrilous personal attacks, an avenue for the creation of urban legends which are deeply corrosive of the political system and of people’s faith in it.”

Rove said Rather and his producer, Mary Mapes, were gunning for the president and trying to help his challenger, Sen. John Kerry, by broadcasting the forged documents in the heat of the presidential campaign.

“From her body language and his body language, their enthusiasm for this story was in large measure fed by the belief that they were playing a constructive and perhaps determinative role in the presidential campaign,” Rove said of Mapes and Rather.

“They made a decision in this instance – I think quite prematurely and quite unfairly – to pursue a story that attacked the president,” he added. “And I thought it was, to me, one of the most incredible examples of how fundamentally unfair it was.”

Rove expressed astonishment that CBS ignored the warnings of document experts hired by the network to authenticate the National Guard memos.

“It goes back to the failure of the mainstream media, in this instance, to honor their own experts,” he said.

Rove is not the only senior Bush adviser who considers the mainstream media biased against the conservative president. White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card was outraged that the TV networks refused to declare Bush the winner on Election Night, even after all the votes were counted in the pivotal state Ohio and it became obvious Kerry could not win.

“Some of the talking heads,” Card said, “were rooting for a crisis in Ohio. It wasn’t just that they were afraid to admit we had won.”

Card became particularly incensed when Bush’s Ohio lead reached 120,000 votes, which was mathematically insurmountable.

“Nobody wanted to call it so that we had won,” he said. “It was like, c’mon, are they just afraid to say it?”

Developing...

[Steve_Seattle]

I think it's Harper's this month that has a Lewis Lapham article calling for Bush's impeachment. And the Atlantic has turned sharp Left since Michael Kelly's death.

[Balding_Eagle]

STRATEGERY?

Isn't supposed to be spelled STRATEREGY?

[buck61]

If you are a Republican and you listen to NPR, you know the TV part of NPR is funded by local contributions. When they start their fund drives in the Spring, turn them off.
I use to support them yrs. ago but no longer. I have noticed even at the local level how bias they have become.

[squarebarb]

AP is not-for-profit?

I have a funny story about AP. A met a woman whose husband is an AP reporter. She was in great distress because their daughter had become a Christian and was doing missionary work. She said,

"Where did she ever get that? I mean, she's the daughter of an AP reporter."

I just shrugged.

[Wasanother]

The MSM is disappearing into oblivion anyway, maybe they could just throw in a couple skewed polls for old time sake?

[Steve_Seattle]

One thing I've really noticed about the media in recent years is the groupthink mentality - how some ridiculous stories become feeding frenzies - Plame, the Cheney shooting accident, Bush's "fake turkey" photo, etc - whereas others - Sandy Berger stealing classified documents - sink like a stone.

[driftless]

"go out of business"

Interesting point. We will probably always need the big "news" gathering publications and networks simply because the average blogger cannot gather them him or herself. Fortunately their days of lying about or ignoring important news and getting away with it is over. The ranks of the news gatherers is still overwhelmingly liberal in disposition, so expecting fair news reporting from them simply cannot be expected. The recent discovery of rigged CBS polls is just another in a long series of liberal "news" fiascos. Bloggers will always have to be on their toes.

[SittinYonder]

AP is not-for-profit?

Yes.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Wall Street Journal by mail and the Lake of the Ozarks paper, the Lake Sun Leader, which has a circulation of about 7500.

[Geronimo]

STRATEGERY?

Isn't supposed to be spelled STRATEREGY?

I have an awful time spelling and pronouncing Bushisms...lol

[Grampa Dave]

Below is the one year chart of the NY Slimes, Washington Post and the Tribune which owns the La Slimes and Chicago Tribune.

[SittinYonder]

We will probably always need the big "news" gathering publications and networks simply because the average blogger cannot gather them him or herself

Yes, but our need of them does not keep them in business. As they continue to lose subscribers and advertisers have more avenues for their dollars, these big newspapers will fold. It's been happening for years.

Cities that used to support two large dailies now have one. Layoffs are a constant. The industry appears to be collapsing, except for the small weekly papers. Most of the small dailies appear to be in trouble, too. Yet not one of them seems to have hit upon a way to improve revenue (excepting the smaller weekly papers that largely are still doing OK depending on local economies).

[driftless]

My wife and I subscribe to the largest daily in our area. It's a small paper in a metro pop. of about one hundred and twentyfive thousand. I will occasionally purchase big city dailies. And yes the local rag we get is overwhelmingly liberal slanted. My wife gets it for the ads. The political content of the paper is pukeworthy. I wish I could start a counter paper to their bovine excrement.

[I'm ALL Right!]

NU-CU-LAR

[FlipWilson]

The funny thing is that the MSM thinks it is destroying the Bush agenda by continuing the wave of "bad news" for the President. What the MSM doesn't realize is that constantly being in "get Bush" mode, is actually helping the President advance part of his agenda, namely, the destruction of the MSM. This article from Drudge only confirms for me that the President's agenda is to destroy, or erode beyond repair, the MSM's credibility.

I think this is why the White House seems to enjoy poking sticks in the MSM's eye. Obviously, Rove et. al. have concluded they will not even get close to a fair shake in the partisan MSM, thus they are banking on the New Media to get their message out. The midterm elections should be a test of the New Media's power. Will it be enough?

[SittinYonder]

Wall Street Journal by mail and the Lake of the Ozarks paper, the Lake Sun Leader, which has a circulation of about 7500.

EXACTLY. The only reason I don't subscribe to the WSJ is because I get it at work. I see a time in the not-too-distant future where community newspapers and the WSJ are the only viable newspapers anymore. I expect alternative papers in large cities will survive, too. But the WSJ is the only national newspaper that is improving its revenue that I know of.

The second largest newspaper chain, Knight Ridder, is selling off everything.

[Grampa Dave]

[SittinYonder]

The political content of the paper is pukeworthy.

I think this is how they're going to have to rearrange their business model to stay profitable. They've got to get the bias out or the smaller dailies will go the way of the national papers. I'm not sure they know how to do it.

[Grampa Dave]

[Grampa Dave]

Mankind is sometimes better off when certain endangered species become extinct. The PC left wing editorial cartoonists should be put out of their misery and fired.