Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wyattearp
. . . meaning now it is your turn.

I don't think I'm smart enough. I'd just take the number 8 and double it. Then see how many times it takes by the same doubling to get to 6 billion. I think it's between 29 and 30. If that were generations of 40 years, then it would take c. 1200 years to get 6 billion. Maybe there are others who can help here.

I wasn't the one who asserted the impossibility. But I did ask for the math. So far I don't think anyone has supplied sufficient evidence to substantiate the impossibility of it all.

787 posted on 02/28/2006 9:09:17 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew; AmishDude
I'd just take the number 8 and double it.

Unfortunately, it's way more complicated than that. I also think that you have to start with 3 instead of 8, since that is the number of fertile women on the boat. The fact that people die also has to be taken into account; infant mortality rates, longevity, disease, war, etc.

Too bad AmishDude isn't still on, as I think he might actually enjoy doing something like this. It is certainly way over my head, which is why I went looking around on the internet to see if anybody had already crunched the numbers.

(AmishDude: we were discussing how long it would take to repopulate the earth after the alleged flood, FYI).

794 posted on 02/28/2006 9:39:45 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson