[Thatcherite]

There is no sorting by size, weight, length of leg, running ability or the ability to tread water for a really really long time.

ROFL.

Everyone can see that the fossil record supports a global flood about 4000 years ago. Particularly if you avoid examining any rocks at all, and just get all of your geological specimens from the Bible.

The "running for higher ground" explanation for sorting is also particularly excellent. Its curious that the plantlife that more closely resembles modern plantlife also appears to have been better at running for higher ground.

[Thatcherite]

1500 Yeah Baby!

[ahayes]

Its curious that the plantlife that more closely resembles modern plantlife also appears to have been better at running for higher ground.

You, Sir (or Ma'am), are lucky that I had already finished my drink.

[Doctor Stochastic]

[Fester Chugabrew]

The densities of each organism under conditions of aquatic decomposition would also have a hand in the sorting process. I don't see this being taken into account. Even if it were, should the result controvert the status quo of evolutionsts it would simply be dismissed as incorrectly assessed.

At bottom, you have texts (and people) in whom you place your trust, and I have mine. You are certainly not entitled to have your views specially protected by law from challenge in a public, academic, or scientific context. The only tools you have to address the prospect of a global flood are scoffing, ridicule, and false accusations.