Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
About the best I might be able to do is take certain catastrophic occurrences we have been able witness, and then consider what might happen if these were amplified in magnitude so as to effect the entire planet.

Which is exactly what geologists did and what led them to realize there had never been a universal flood.

1,355 posted on 03/02/2006 4:55:05 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1353 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
Which is exactly what geologists did and what led them to realize there had never been a universal flood.

Yeah, but what if they're wrong, and even though there's no evidence for it, what if the Flood was real? My theory is just as good as yours. Teach the controversy!
</creationism mode>

1,356 posted on 03/02/2006 4:58:15 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies ]

To: Junior

Can't argue with you that some, if not many, geologists reject a global flood. They probably also assume that all geologic processes have taken place in basically the same way, at the same rates, and in the same magnitude throughout all time; IOW based upon the recorded observations in their field and personal experience, a reversal of current processes does not lead to evidence of a global flood.


1,358 posted on 03/02/2006 5:13:31 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson