To: Fester Chugabrew
Sure they did. They went looking for evidence to support their assumptions and found it. That is a barefaced, shameful lie, and I don't care what the mods think about it. The early geologists were devout Christians looking for evidence of the flood. You are a disgrace to your religion and should stop before you convince everyone that Christians are ignorant, lying scum.
To: js1138; Fester Chugabrew
"If they had confidence in the salability of their ideas, would they need to play word games, resort to euphemisms, revise history, distort facts and repeat patently false charges?"
David Limbaugh, "The Left lies because it must," 2006-01-27
1,164 posted on
03/02/2006 8:07:16 AM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: js1138
That is a barefaced, shameful lie, and I don't care what the mods think about it. The early geologists were devout Christians looking for evidence of the flood. You are a disgrace to your religion and should stop before you convince everyone that Christians are ignorant, lying scum.Seconded.
1,172 posted on
03/02/2006 8:26:48 AM PST by
Thatcherite
(More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
To: js1138
Taqqiya of some ilk are protected species.
1,178 posted on
03/02/2006 9:07:25 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: js1138
There is no shame in looking for evidence to support one's assumptions and then finding it. Had these people whom you are convinced to have been "devout Christians" maintained that there was indeed a global flood, you would simply place them on the side of people like myself who supposedly represent a "disgrace to my religion." Why not try holding back on the vitriol and understanding that there is more than one way scientifically to comprehend reality?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson