Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE: BUSH NOW ADMITS BIN LADEN HELPED HIM BEAT JOHN KERRY...
http://drudgereport.com/flash3wsa.htm ^

Posted on 02/27/2006 3:16:50 PM PST by lauriehelds

Edited on 02/27/2006 3:36:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]



XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FEB 27, 2006 18:01:23 ET XXXXX

BUSH NOW ADMITS BIN LADEN HELPED HIM BEAT JOHN KERRY

**Exclusive**

President Bush now says his 2004 victory over Sen. John Kerry, who is mulling a comeback in 2008, was inadvertently aided by al Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin Laden.

And Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who steadfastly refused to defend Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth when he ran Bush’s campaign, now calls them “heroes” who played a crucial role in vanquishing Kerry.

Bill Sammon, Senior White House Correspondent for the WASHINGTON EXAMINER, scores another exclusive for Tuesday editions with explosive excerpts from his new book, STRATEGERY.

For the first time, the president says he was helped by bin Laden, who put out a videotaped diatribe against Bush the Friday before the 2004 election.

Bush said there were “enormous amounts of discussion” inside his campaign about the 15-minute tape, which he called “an interesting entry by our enemy” into the presidential race.

“What does it mean? Is it going to help? Is it going to hurt?” he said in an exclusive interview for the new book STRATEGERY. “Anything that drops in at the end of a campaign that is not already decided creates all kinds of anxieties, because you’re not sure of the effect.

“I thought it was going to help,” he decided. “I thought it would help remind people that if bin Laden doesn’t want Bush to be the president, something must be right with Bush.”

Mehlman agreed, citing polls that show Americans trust Republicans more than Democrats on matters of national security.

“It reminded people of the stakes,” he said in an interview for STRATEGERY. “It reinforced an issue on which Bush had a big lead over Kerry.”

Even the mainstream media fretted about the tape’s potential to help Bush. Former CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite told CNN that White House strategist Karl Rove “probably set up bin Laden to this thing.”

The bin Laden tape was not the only curveball thrown at Bush in the closing days of the campaign. The NEW YORK TIMES published a story faulting the administration for failing to safeguard a cache of weapons in Iraq that went missing around the time of the U.S. invasion more than eighteen months earlier.

Some Republicans regarded the story as a political “stink bomb,” much like the revelation just before the 2000 election that Bush had once been arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol.

Bush said the weapons flap “was different from the DUI story, which defined me personally—as opposed to my policies. And there’s a difference.”

The Times quoted Kerry accusing the president of “incredible incompetence” and calling the missing explosives “one of the great blunders of Iraq.”

Bush responded by turning Kerry’s newfound concern over weapons against him.

“After repeatedly calling Iraq the wrong war, and a diversion, Senator Kerry this week seemed shocked to learn that Iraq was a dangerous place, full of dangerous weapons,” Bush deadpanned, drawing laughter from an audience in Pennsylvania.

Mehlman was similarly incredulous that Kerry would deviate from his long-held position that Bush had exaggerated the weapons threat in Iraq.

“I was stunned that he brought it up,” the campaign manager said. “He was essentially saying it was wrong to remove Saddam Hussein, even though we’ve just discovered all these dangerous weapons in the country.

“Politics is like a chess game,” he added. “If you don’t think a few moves ahead, then you always end up like Homer Simpson going, ‘Doh!’”

Even more helpful to the Bush campaign was the flap over Kerry’s Vietnam service. For the first time, Mehlman is now defending the Swift Boat veterans, who questioned Kerry’s Vietnam record and savaged his claim that U.S. soldiers were war criminals.

“These are people who are incredible,” Mehlman said of the “Swifties.” “You may disagree with what they’re saying. But these are heroes. These are people that suffered in prison camps for America.

“And to respond and say, ‘These are bums who don’t have a right to speak. But other veterans who agree with us do,’ is responding with a hammer and not a scalpel,” he added. “The Kerry campaign seemed unable to use a scalpel. Instead, they had to use a hammer for everything.”

After the election, Rove and other Bush officials initially downplayed any role the Swift Boat Veterans might have played in the campaign. But now there is widespread acknowledgment in the White House that the veterans were pivotal in vanquishing Kerry.

“I felt they had a very big impact,” Mehlman said.

White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card said in an interview that the Swift Boat Veterans “had an impact to Kerry’s detriment. I think they tended to put him on the defensive.”

But that impact would not have been possible if Kerry had not spent so much time emphasizing his Vietnam record, Mehlman said.

“I think the mistake that Kerry made was making the entire essence of his campaign that he served in Vietnam,” he said. “Ultimately, it wasn’t that relevant of an issue.”

Besides, by focusing on Vietnam, Kerry invited criticism of his 1971 congressional testimony that fellow Vietnam veterans were war criminals, Mehlman said.

“No one’s taking away his service,” he emphasized. “The question was his judgment when he came back.”

Ultimately, Kerry’s emphasis on Vietnam proved self-defeating.

“It reinforced something about him,” Mehlman said. “By the end of the campaign, from a character perspective, he came across as a guy who is just ambition over everything.”

He contrasted Kerry unfavorably with former Sen. Bob Dole, Kansas Republican, who was severely wounded in World War II, and Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: issues; kerrydefeat; nationalsecurity; strategery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic

No, it's not out of context, it's from Bill Sammons' new book "Strategery," which came out today and is favorable to Bush. Sammons interviewed the President (and Rove, and Cheney, and lots of others) who stated the obvious: that bin Laden's rants the weekend before the election just made Bush seem tougher.

Sammons was on Hannity's radio show this afternoon discussing the book and is to be on the TV show tonight.

I wish Freepers would overreact less and consider more.


41 posted on 02/27/2006 3:29:45 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xrp
BUSH IN LEAGUE WITH BIN LADEN! THIS PROVES IT! /tinfoil


42 posted on 02/27/2006 3:31:26 PM PST by proud_yank (Liberalism - The 'Culture of Ignorance'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
When Bin Laden supposedly said that blue states would be spared attacks, the common american voter reacted like national patriots...and voted for the man who was trying to kill him.

I'm talking about the "undecided" voter.

43 posted on 02/27/2006 3:33:41 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Sorry if you think I over reacted. I don't agree.

I still maintain that the headline is out of context. It was meant to titillate the reader and to imply that Bin Ladin actively and intentionally influenced in the election. That is a far different thing than the reality -- passive help from a scheme that backfired on bin Ladin.

This is the kind of wild accusation that the dum Dems take literally. My sister in law will be ranting about this for the next 5 years.


44 posted on 02/27/2006 3:33:45 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bannedfromdu

If the Bush Campaign would have gotten behind, or at least stopped 'denouncing' the Swiftboat Vets, the could have probably added 5% at the Polls.

These guys had a lot to say, and should have had a bigger audience. In a real world, Lawrence O'donnell would be forever banned from public life for his ridiculous and childish attack on John O'Neill


45 posted on 02/27/2006 3:35:31 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

LOL! Drudge's site stats must be down...


46 posted on 02/27/2006 3:37:34 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48


This is true but in the final analysis, I have no doubt the Swiftvets put the nail in his coffin.

As a Nam vet and contributor to the Swiftvets, I take pride in that fact.


47 posted on 02/27/2006 3:39:51 PM PST by bannedfromdu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
...BIN LADEN HELPED HIM BEAT JOHN KERRY...

Not nearly as much as John Kerry helped him.

Have to disagree with the first statement - Kerry needed no help losing. Tho I doubt any politician here as much influence over what OBL does..

48 posted on 02/27/2006 3:42:19 PM PST by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

I think John Kerry helped beat John Kerry more than anyone.


49 posted on 02/27/2006 3:44:35 PM PST by MikeA (New York owes America an apology for Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
If the Bush Campaign would have gotten behind, or at least stopped 'denouncing' the Swiftboat Vets, the could have probably added 5% at the Polls.

Kerry lost completely on his own merits. The problem with the Swifters is that in questioning JFK, they were also calling into question the service of all the men on those boats during the particular operation in question. That wouldn't have made Bush look good, no matter what the real story was. And the temptation to question anybody's military service in the future will be too great - I'm uncomfortable going down that road (that tactic backfired somewhat with Paul Hackett).

50 posted on 02/27/2006 3:50:17 PM PST by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

If Drudge was posting a headline out of context, Sammons and Hannity were doing the same thing on the air this afternoon. This is good stuff.

A statement by the world's most notorious terrorist on the eve of a Presidential election, in an admitted effort to influence that election, is titillating.

It was when it happened, and it still is now that we're far enough away to analyze what bin Laden was trying and whether it worked -- especially when Bush himself weighs in.

When I read what Sammons wrote and what Bush said, I see no ammo for the Democrats. Rather, it confirms my first reaction in Nov., 2004 (when I was out of state working in the campaign).

Bin Laden DID help Bush, thank the Good Lord. Sincerely and literally.


51 posted on 02/27/2006 3:52:25 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

During the election Bin Laden released another of his stupid tapes, and reminded the world he was still out there. Folks had no choice but to vote for Bush, cause Kerry would be worthless against terrorism.


52 posted on 02/27/2006 4:02:51 PM PST by passionfruit ("...I think the left wing is turning into a cult... If you disagree you're a traitor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ziggygrey

And, let's be candid -- it was difficult for the Bush campaign to comment negatively on Kerry's Vietnam experience when Bush's own Na. Guard service was under suspicion. By not bashing Kerry, Bush could take the high ground, and people would consider the Dems' criticism of Bush's Guard duty petty.


53 posted on 02/27/2006 4:16:00 PM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

"I see no ammo for the Democrats..." LOL. YOu forget how DUMB they are. They are still ranting, "Bush lied and people died and carrying on about Florida in 2000."


54 posted on 02/27/2006 4:19:00 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Hello! Good to see you. You've been mighty quiet.


55 posted on 02/27/2006 4:20:05 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

What a S-T-U-P-I-D headline.


56 posted on 02/27/2006 4:25:59 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds

The Swift Boat Vets saved this country from John Kerry.

By the way where is Kerry's F-180.


57 posted on 02/27/2006 4:26:04 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Thanks "AFTR." I've been around, but "lurking" more than in the past.


58 posted on 02/27/2006 4:26:10 PM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lauriehelds
And Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who steadfastly refused to defend Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth when he ran Bush’s campaign, now calls them “heroes” who played a crucial role in vanquishing Kerry.

Drudge blew it on the headline. Mehlman praising the Swiftees is more of a grabber than the obvious fact that bin laden did Kerry no favors by threatening people who voted for Bush.

59 posted on 02/27/2006 4:27:58 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc
Bin Laden helped by reminding people what a dork Kerry was.


60 posted on 02/27/2006 4:31:16 PM PST by Mr. Brightside (I know what I like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson