Posted on 02/27/2006 3:16:50 PM PST by lauriehelds
Edited on 02/27/2006 3:36:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FEB 27, 2006 18:01:23 ET XXXXX
BUSH NOW ADMITS BIN LADEN HELPED HIM BEAT JOHN KERRY
**Exclusive**
President Bush now says his 2004 victory over Sen. John Kerry, who is mulling a comeback in 2008, was inadvertently aided by al Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin Laden.
And Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who steadfastly refused to defend Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth when he ran Bushs campaign, now calls them heroes who played a crucial role in vanquishing Kerry.
Bill Sammon, Senior White House Correspondent for the WASHINGTON EXAMINER, scores another exclusive for Tuesday editions with explosive excerpts from his new book, STRATEGERY.
For the first time, the president says he was helped by bin Laden, who put out a videotaped diatribe against Bush the Friday before the 2004 election.
Bush said there were enormous amounts of discussion inside his campaign about the 15-minute tape, which he called an interesting entry by our enemy into the presidential race.
What does it mean? Is it going to help? Is it going to hurt? he said in an exclusive interview for the new book STRATEGERY. Anything that drops in at the end of a campaign that is not already decided creates all kinds of anxieties, because youre not sure of the effect.
I thought it was going to help, he decided. I thought it would help remind people that if bin Laden doesnt want Bush to be the president, something must be right with Bush.
Mehlman agreed, citing polls that show Americans trust Republicans more than Democrats on matters of national security.
It reminded people of the stakes, he said in an interview for STRATEGERY. It reinforced an issue on which Bush had a big lead over Kerry.
Even the mainstream media fretted about the tapes potential to help Bush. Former CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite told CNN that White House strategist Karl Rove probably set up bin Laden to this thing.
The bin Laden tape was not the only curveball thrown at Bush in the closing days of the campaign. The NEW YORK TIMES published a story faulting the administration for failing to safeguard a cache of weapons in Iraq that went missing around the time of the U.S. invasion more than eighteen months earlier.
Some Republicans regarded the story as a political stink bomb, much like the revelation just before the 2000 election that Bush had once been arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol.
Bush said the weapons flap was different from the DUI story, which defined me personallyas opposed to my policies. And theres a difference.
The Times quoted Kerry accusing the president of incredible incompetence and calling the missing explosives one of the great blunders of Iraq.
Bush responded by turning Kerrys newfound concern over weapons against him.
After repeatedly calling Iraq the wrong war, and a diversion, Senator Kerry this week seemed shocked to learn that Iraq was a dangerous place, full of dangerous weapons, Bush deadpanned, drawing laughter from an audience in Pennsylvania.
Mehlman was similarly incredulous that Kerry would deviate from his long-held position that Bush had exaggerated the weapons threat in Iraq.
I was stunned that he brought it up, the campaign manager said. He was essentially saying it was wrong to remove Saddam Hussein, even though weve just discovered all these dangerous weapons in the country.
Politics is like a chess game, he added. If you dont think a few moves ahead, then you always end up like Homer Simpson going, Doh!
Even more helpful to the Bush campaign was the flap over Kerrys Vietnam service. For the first time, Mehlman is now defending the Swift Boat veterans, who questioned Kerrys Vietnam record and savaged his claim that U.S. soldiers were war criminals.
These are people who are incredible, Mehlman said of the Swifties. You may disagree with what theyre saying. But these are heroes. These are people that suffered in prison camps for America.
And to respond and say, These are bums who dont have a right to speak. But other veterans who agree with us do, is responding with a hammer and not a scalpel, he added. The Kerry campaign seemed unable to use a scalpel. Instead, they had to use a hammer for everything.
After the election, Rove and other Bush officials initially downplayed any role the Swift Boat Veterans might have played in the campaign. But now there is widespread acknowledgment in the White House that the veterans were pivotal in vanquishing Kerry.
I felt they had a very big impact, Mehlman said.
White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card said in an interview that the Swift Boat Veterans had an impact to Kerrys detriment. I think they tended to put him on the defensive.
But that impact would not have been possible if Kerry had not spent so much time emphasizing his Vietnam record, Mehlman said.
I think the mistake that Kerry made was making the entire essence of his campaign that he served in Vietnam, he said. Ultimately, it wasnt that relevant of an issue.
Besides, by focusing on Vietnam, Kerry invited criticism of his 1971 congressional testimony that fellow Vietnam veterans were war criminals, Mehlman said.
No ones taking away his service, he emphasized. The question was his judgment when he came back.
Ultimately, Kerrys emphasis on Vietnam proved self-defeating.
It reinforced something about him, Mehlman said. By the end of the campaign, from a character perspective, he came across as a guy who is just ambition over everything.
He contrasted Kerry unfavorably with former Sen. Bob Dole, Kansas Republican, who was severely wounded in World War II, and Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.
No, it's not out of context, it's from Bill Sammons' new book "Strategery," which came out today and is favorable to Bush. Sammons interviewed the President (and Rove, and Cheney, and lots of others) who stated the obvious: that bin Laden's rants the weekend before the election just made Bush seem tougher.
Sammons was on Hannity's radio show this afternoon discussing the book and is to be on the TV show tonight.
I wish Freepers would overreact less and consider more.
I'm talking about the "undecided" voter.
Sorry if you think I over reacted. I don't agree.
I still maintain that the headline is out of context. It was meant to titillate the reader and to imply that Bin Ladin actively and intentionally influenced in the election. That is a far different thing than the reality -- passive help from a scheme that backfired on bin Ladin.
This is the kind of wild accusation that the dum Dems take literally. My sister in law will be ranting about this for the next 5 years.
If the Bush Campaign would have gotten behind, or at least stopped 'denouncing' the Swiftboat Vets, the could have probably added 5% at the Polls.
These guys had a lot to say, and should have had a bigger audience. In a real world, Lawrence O'donnell would be forever banned from public life for his ridiculous and childish attack on John O'Neill
LOL! Drudge's site stats must be down...
This is true but in the final analysis, I have no doubt the Swiftvets put the nail in his coffin.
As a Nam vet and contributor to the Swiftvets, I take pride in that fact.
Not nearly as much as John Kerry helped him.
Have to disagree with the first statement - Kerry needed no help losing. Tho I doubt any politician here as much influence over what OBL does..
I think John Kerry helped beat John Kerry more than anyone.
Kerry lost completely on his own merits. The problem with the Swifters is that in questioning JFK, they were also calling into question the service of all the men on those boats during the particular operation in question. That wouldn't have made Bush look good, no matter what the real story was. And the temptation to question anybody's military service in the future will be too great - I'm uncomfortable going down that road (that tactic backfired somewhat with Paul Hackett).
If Drudge was posting a headline out of context, Sammons and Hannity were doing the same thing on the air this afternoon. This is good stuff.
A statement by the world's most notorious terrorist on the eve of a Presidential election, in an admitted effort to influence that election, is titillating.
It was when it happened, and it still is now that we're far enough away to analyze what bin Laden was trying and whether it worked -- especially when Bush himself weighs in.
When I read what Sammons wrote and what Bush said, I see no ammo for the Democrats. Rather, it confirms my first reaction in Nov., 2004 (when I was out of state working in the campaign).
Bin Laden DID help Bush, thank the Good Lord. Sincerely and literally.
During the election Bin Laden released another of his stupid tapes, and reminded the world he was still out there. Folks had no choice but to vote for Bush, cause Kerry would be worthless against terrorism.
And, let's be candid -- it was difficult for the Bush campaign to comment negatively on Kerry's Vietnam experience when Bush's own Na. Guard service was under suspicion. By not bashing Kerry, Bush could take the high ground, and people would consider the Dems' criticism of Bush's Guard duty petty.
"I see no ammo for the Democrats..." LOL. YOu forget how DUMB they are. They are still ranting, "Bush lied and people died and carrying on about Florida in 2000."
Hello! Good to see you. You've been mighty quiet.
What a S-T-U-P-I-D headline.
The Swift Boat Vets saved this country from John Kerry.
By the way where is Kerry's F-180.
Thanks "AFTR." I've been around, but "lurking" more than in the past.
Drudge blew it on the headline. Mehlman praising the Swiftees is more of a grabber than the obvious fact that bin laden did Kerry no favors by threatening people who voted for Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.