Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fitz should quit his day job and go into comedy.
1 posted on 02/27/2006 10:54:25 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: frankjr

Fitzgerald is just milking this assignment for as long as he can and for as much income as he can.

Any beat cop in America could have determined in a day that Plame was nothing more than a desk jockey at CIA; nothing more, nothing less.


3 posted on 02/27/2006 10:59:22 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Great posting ...........
The headline says just about everything there is about this sorry saga.


4 posted on 02/27/2006 10:59:54 AM PST by IrishMike (Dry Powder is a plus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

To be honest, Scooter is in the same boat previously sailed by Martha Stewart - indicted for lying about a No-Crime.


5 posted on 02/27/2006 11:00:20 AM PST by sono ( I did something dumb this weekend—I walked into a Muslim bakery and asked for a Danish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Preposterous. Lewis Carroll would love it.


7 posted on 02/27/2006 11:03:06 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

IMO this writer misses the biggest news -

The judge told Libby's lawyers, and thereby the public, we don't need to know who the first leaker to Novak was.


8 posted on 02/27/2006 11:05:12 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Judge Walton interrupted. Yes, that's what's in the indictment, the judge said, but he might not allow it to be discussed during the trial. "Just because it's alleged in the indictment doesn't necessarily make it admissible," the judge said.

It's too late. The jury pool has been tainted.

9 posted on 02/27/2006 11:05:35 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
"She was definitely undercover by agency standards at the time in question," the source says.

Funny, but the CIA standards are clearly out of step with the law itself - otherwise Fitzy would have cited a violation of the covert status law.

10 posted on 02/27/2006 11:08:03 AM PST by MortMan (Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

By the time this is all said and done, Fitz will have so many layers of egg on his face he'll never be able to peel them off.


11 posted on 02/27/2006 11:10:35 AM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Bookmark.


15 posted on 02/27/2006 11:32:13 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Fitz:Mr Libby Lied.
Libby's lawyer:About what?
Fitz:About who said Valeria Flame was a covert agent first.
Libby's lawyer: Was she a covert agent?
Fitz: I don't know it's not germane.
Libby's lawyer:If it's not germane what did Mr. Libby lie about that is germane to this case?
Fitz: About who said she was a covert agent first.
Libby's lawyer: Was she?
Fitz:It's not germane.
Libby's lawyer: But Mr Libby lied about something not germane to this case?
Fitz:Yes.
Libby's lawyer: Did Mr. Libby lie about something germane to this case?
Fitz: That's what I'm saying.
Libby's lawyer: Saying what that is germane?
Fitz: That's right, germane.
Libby's lawyer: To this case.
Fitz: Yes.
Libby's lawyer: What.
Fitz: No, What's on second.


16 posted on 02/27/2006 11:35:05 AM PST by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Did Fitzgerald perjure himself when he claimed to actually have investigated this case?


23 posted on 02/27/2006 11:56:13 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

So, Fitz wasn't running an "investigation," he was running a perjury trap. My tax dollars at work.


27 posted on 02/27/2006 12:09:14 PM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

I'm still miffed as to how Fitzgerald could investigate her status for two years without finding out whether the Intelligence Identities Protection Act was violated. A simple questionaire sent to the CIA asking for yes or no answers to the statute's requirements, with a request for supporting documentation would have determined in less than one month whether the statute had been violated and further investigation would not be needed. The same could be done with the espionage act of 1917, if he wanted to.

The question of whether reporters knew her identity before Libby told them or whether libby himself learned it from reporters is immaterial at that point. In fact, it never would have needed to be asked.

This case gives me heartburn.


36 posted on 02/27/2006 2:34:33 PM PST by bragginright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

"Does the government intend to introduce any evidence of damage or her status?" Walton asked.

"We don't intend to offer any proof of actual damage," Fitzgerald responded"

*snip*

...We are just going to send him away for political reasons.


38 posted on 02/27/2006 2:43:47 PM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

big bttt


47 posted on 02/27/2006 5:01:24 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
"The documents remain classified and contain information compiled for law enforcement purposes that is neither material to the preparation of the defense, nor exculpatory as to Mr. Libby."

"....nor exculpatory as to Mr. Libby"...According to who? The Kangaroo Court prosecutor?

48 posted on 02/27/2006 7:45:39 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson