LOL, oh my...
Bleep wrote:
"granted the terms are mixed, but the point is one of hypocrisy. We don't want China to own our oil companies; we don't want the French to tell us how to deal with terrorists; we don't want the UN to mess in our affairs; we want to protect our homeland. But then the administration, although we control the security, gives the control of the ports (management) to Dubai, who has allowed terrorists to pass through its borders, and funded terrorist organizations. The Bush administration is essentially proving Michael Moore's point. I am sure other more reputable allies in the war on terror would be available."
Does Michael Moore want the US to stick its nose into foreign business dealings, like this sale of a British Company to a UAE company? Would he have been happier if the Singapore state-run company, PSA, had won the bidding?
What does Michael Moore think of the fact that Chinese companies (which are all directly or indirectly controlled/owned by their Communist government) already run many of our terminals.
Is Moore afraid to have the Arabs compete with the Chinese government company COSCO? Does he have rich "friends" at COSCO or other places in China, like Hillary does?
Doesn't Moore want the Arabs to get exemptions from US laws like the Chinese got?
Does Moore know that COSCO has been given exemptions from US laws which "discriminate" against foreign state-run shipping companies?
Does Moore want us to "repossess" the COSCO ships built by Clinton's guaranteed loans in Mobile, AL shipyards?
What does Moore think of Clinton's attempts to lease the Long Beach navy base to COSCO?
What does Moore think of the Clinton-arranged loan for a nuclear reactor which powers the shipyard which builds Chinese warships near Shanghai?