I'd hate to be in the Governor's shoes if he doesn't sign it!
To: Aussie Dasher
When is he going to sign it for heaven's sakes? Is there a certain time he has to do this? What's holding him up? Sign the darn thing and get it done!!! Someone explain this to me please?????????????
3 posted on
02/26/2006 6:01:27 PM PST by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know. Go Rush!)
To: Aussie Dasher
"It's a sad state of affairs that we have only one choice (for abortion) right now," said Charon Asetoyer of the Native American Women's Health Care Education Resource Center in Lake Andes. "But if you have to go out of state, the cost of making that trip will be prohibitive." It would be a whole lot less than the cost of propping up the ACLU, Planned Parenthood and others of similar ilk who eat out the sustainence of taxpayers.
4 posted on
02/26/2006 6:06:52 PM PST by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: Aussie Dasher
Gov. Mike Rounds said he is inclined to sign a bill that would ban nearly all abortions in South DakotaInclined?
What kind of a RINO wimp is this guy? Sign the damned thing so the courts and SCOTUS can get on with it.
Besides, we all want to see the libs going ballistic. They do that so well J
5 posted on
02/26/2006 6:12:28 PM PST by
upchuck
(Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
To: Aussie Dasher
If a rape victim becomes pregnant and bears a child, the rapist could have the same parental rights as the mother, said Krista Heeren-Graber, executive director of the South Dakota Network Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault. Hypocrite!!!
If that's what you cared about a law could be passed denying rapists parental rights, if that isn't already the case.
She's more interested in killing babies than protecting victims.
6 posted on
02/26/2006 7:05:40 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
To: Aussie Dasher
As a South Dakota resident and pro life Catholic, I still see this bill as doing little if anything to curtail or end abortion in South Dakota or nationally. This bill is crudely fashioned and was basically railroaded through the Legislature. It will be immediately appealed when signed and then begin years of litigation while the abortionists in this state continue their grisly work unfettered. Given the nature of this bill I seriously doubt it will ever make it to the SCOTUS and will be defeated by the Appeals Court.
Our Legislature could have taken a less radical course that would have significantly slowed abortion in this state to the point of not being profitable for the abortionists (it's all about the money) and had some likelihood of surviving in the federal courts.
This bill will just leave the taxpayers of South Dakota millions in debt and not have any affect on ending abortion.
8 posted on
02/26/2006 8:27:40 PM PST by
The Great RJ
("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: Aussie Dasher
"It's a sad state of affairs that we have only one choice (for abortion) right now," said Charon Asetoyer of the Native American Women's Health Care Education Resource Center in Lake Andes. "But if you have to go out of state, the cost of making that trip will be prohibitive."I never thought about this before, and have never seen it mentioned anywhere: What's stopping Indian reservations from having abortion clinics? If I'm not mistaken, state laws can't prevent that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson