Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ConocoPhillips ratchets up North Slope activity this year
Alaska Journal of Commerce ^ | Sunday, February 26, 2006 | Tim Bradner

Posted on 02/26/2006 2:50:29 PM PST by thackney

ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc. is having one of its busiest winter drilling and construction seasons in years on the North Slope, according to its president, Jim Bowles. Drilling and well-workover activity in the Kuparuk River field is at levels not seen since the early 1980s, when the field was first developed.

Bowles briefed state legislators in Juneau on the company's activities and presented other information at the Alaska Support Industry Alliance annual Meet Alaska conference in late January.

He said that ConocoPhillips has 2.2 million man-hours of construction underway this winter, a 50 percent increase over 2005 construction activity. In terms of rig activity, there will be 60 months of rig and coiled-tubing rig activity this year, up from 45 months last year.

Along with partners, ConocoPhillips will invest $1.5 billion in new projects over the next two to three years, including a new viscous oil project that started production in December 2005.

The recently completed project is the 1-J viscous oil pad in West Sak, a part of the Kuparuk River field, began production on schedule in December, following the earlier startup of new viscous oil wells on the nearby 1-E pad. The new projects will bring West Sak viscous oil production to 45,000 barrels per day. ConocoPhillips and its partners in West Sak, which include BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corp., invested $500 million in the project, Bowles said.

In the Alpine field, west of Kuparuk, two new satellites are being developed and are due to begin production later this year. The two new satellite fields are Nanuq and Fiord, both on state leases on the Colville River delta near the Alpine field. Fiord is expected to begin production this fall with 17 wells, while Nanuq will be in production later this year with 23 wells.

Together, the two satellites will add 30,000 barrels of new production from the North Slope. ConocoPhillips and its minority partner, Anadarko Petroleum Corp., will have spent $500 million in the two satellites.

Bowles said his company and Anadarko are in the permitting stage for development of two additional Alpine satellites, Alpine West and Lookout. These are scheduled to begin production in 2008 or 2009 and will require investment of an additional $500 million. Alpine West and Lookout will be the first commercial productions from the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

ConocoPhillips is also participating in seven exploration wells this winter, along with a 3-D seismic survey in the Teshekpuk Lake area of the northeastern area of NPR-A, Bowles said. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management plans a lease sale in the area next fall. ConocoPhillips will also participate in a seismic survey in the Chukchi Sea Outer Continental Shelf off Alaska's northwest coast in anticipation of a planned federal OCS lease sale in 2007.

Among the 2006 winter projects are three "delineation" wells being drilled in the Kuparuk River field. The wells are aimed at testing undeveloped parts of the West Sak viscous oil deposits to the north of parts of the West Sak now being produced. The company has planned a phased development program for West Sak, starting with the better-quality portions of the reservoir and expanding, over time, to areas believed to be of lesser quality. The test wells planned this winter will help the company evaluate other parts of the West Sak for possible development.

West Sak is a large deposit of heavy, or viscous, oil that overlays the main conventional oil reservoir in the Kuparuk River field. The resources are very large in terms of volume of oil physically present in the reservoir rock - the "in-place" resource is billions of barrels - but producing the oil has presented cost and technology challenges.

It is only in recent years that ConocoPhillips and BP, which is working with similar viscous oil in the Milne Point and Prudhoe fields, have found ways to make viscous oil production economically viable. New technologies like multi-lateral wells and long, extended-reach horizontal production wells have been crucial in making the projects economically viable.

Tim Bradner can be reached at tim.bradner@alaskajournal.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; drilling; energy; northslope; oil
Even without ANWR and the Gas Pipeline, work is building on the Alaskan North Slope. Alpine West and Lookout will extend the western development into NPRA.
1 posted on 02/26/2006 2:50:30 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The sun sets on ConocoPhillips' facilities at its Alpine field in this photo provided by the company. ConocoPhillips, along with Anadarko Petroleum Corp., expects two Alpine satellite fields, Nanuq and Fiord, to both start production by the end of the year. Together, the two fields should add about 30,000 barrels of new production from the North Slope. The two companies are also in the permitting stage for two more satellite fields adjacent to Alpine.
PHOTO/ConocoPhillips

2 posted on 02/26/2006 2:51:28 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

More information on CD5 (Alpine West) at:

http://www.conocophillipsalaska.com/permits/CD5/index.htm


3 posted on 02/26/2006 2:55:33 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
A much need start. Though we are not talking about a huge amount of oil per year, and the fact it may take some three years plus to balance the sheets. This to me is a prime example why oil companies would rather just be able to by fix cost light sweet crude from the ME. The amount of oil extracted per year is almost miniscule as to the amount required to keep at just break even as to our energy needs go.
I wonder. Does anyone have any "factual info" as how much Alaskan oil is sent to Japan these days. This was a issue some years back, where folks where somewhat justified in screaming about the long gas lines, during Jimmity's watch and how much oil was sent directly to Japan or to say the Richmond refineries then the gas sold to Japan instead of keep here for domestic use.
4 posted on 02/26/2006 3:06:00 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

5 posted on 02/26/2006 3:18:44 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Darn! My broker was right 20 years ago. I should never have sold my Conoco stock! Bahwahwahwahwah! :o(


6 posted on 02/26/2006 3:23:01 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Does anyone have any "factual info" as how much Alaskan oil is sent to Japan these days.

No North Slope oil goes to Japan. 100% of Alaskan North Slope oil is kept in America. This has been the case for all but 4 years of the nearly 3 decades of Alaskan oil production. Between 1996-1999 5.5% of North Slope oil was exported to Asian countries. These exports were overwhelmingly supported by the US Congress and by the Clinton Administration to offset an oil glut in California at the time. In June 2000 Alaskan oil again ceased to be exported, and 100% of Alaskan Pipeline Oil production has stayed in America.

7 posted on 02/26/2006 4:19:12 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Apparently anti-Bush college activists are still crying about how caribou are going to go extinct because of Alaskan pipeline drilling. I couldn't believe this when a girl at work was talking about it. I LOL!!! She got mad and I told her they were saying that 30 years ago when I was in elementary school! Then everyone laughed! She stormed off.


8 posted on 02/26/2006 4:57:52 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thank you for the feedback. Great news on my part. Have had that quetion on my mind for a number of years and never seeked the answer.


9 posted on 02/26/2006 5:12:45 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ponca City, OK (Conoco) bump


10 posted on 02/26/2006 5:17:24 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Shawnlaw

The facts are even better. The Central Arctic Caribou Herd, which calved in the area prior to the Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk Oil fields, has grown 8 to 10 times in size in the past three decades of oil production. This herd is also in a much smaller area than the Porcupine Herd of ANWR and has had a much larger percentage of their area impacted than that proposed on the Coastal Plain of ANWR.


11 posted on 02/26/2006 5:29:38 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

Hope you guys don't mind me jumping in. I love threads on AK oil and gas.

There is a liquified natural gas project in southern AK that does export to Asia. I believe that is part of why rumors get started that Alaskan crude oil is exported to asia. The volume is pretty small, and if I am up to date, the project is more an experiment and off shoot of another project rather than stand alone economical production.

We could use the LNG here, but there is no U.S. west coast terminal to recieve the product. Proposals to exploit such a resource meet resistance from the usual suspects. Alot of Southern AK natural gas reservoirs and wells are shut in for lack of market, transportation, and conversion to liquids capacity.


12 posted on 02/26/2006 6:07:48 PM PST by EERinOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Loving that chart and looking for it to go higher.

P/E ~ 8, and P/Book under 2.

Looks like anything around $58-$60 = time to buy.


13 posted on 02/26/2006 6:10:02 PM PST by EERinOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EERinOK

You jump in whenever you like. It's your web site as much as anyone elses. This whole LNG terminal issue is becoming a hot issue of lately. No one wants such terminals in their ports. Much like no one wants oil refineries in their cities/towns/municipalities. We all want low cost oil and gas based fuels but no one wants the industrial facilities around their backyards. Much like no one moving into developments on large tracks of sold farmland want the poor farmers to use natural fertilizers such as manure, because it stinks up their nice new neighborhoods. Draw your own conclusions.


14 posted on 02/26/2006 6:23:15 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EERinOK

geez, i think i'll dump my apple and google and be right over


15 posted on 02/26/2006 6:28:07 PM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
Twenty years ago? Ouch!!!


16 posted on 02/27/2006 6:51:22 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Oh thanks! You just had to do that, didn't you! :0(


17 posted on 02/27/2006 4:27:20 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson