Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael Goldsberry

If Dem DAs believe that Campbell's support is a result of Earle's indictment, they are as mistaken as you.

Honestly, it appears your argument boils down to "We should support DeLay *because* he has been indicted." That is very strange.

As for me, I recognize that Earle's indictment is politically motivated. Your continued mischaracterization is insulting. Unfortunately, you are not alone with that attitude.


25 posted on 02/26/2006 3:39:53 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: SolidSupplySide

Okay, okay. Allow me to back off from attack-mode for a moment.

Do you really believe that Campbell is a better candidate than DeLay?

I'll concede that I will vote for your guy in the general, but not against Tom. Especially because of the precedent it would set.

It's the precedent that you don't seem to understand.


29 posted on 02/26/2006 3:47:07 PM PST by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: SolidSupplySide; Michael Goldsberry
Honestly, it appears your argument boils down to "We should support DeLay *because* he has been indicted." That is very strange.

So your reason to not vote for him is because you hold him to be unethical?

Proof?

I support Delay because he has been one of the few Republicans to play hardball with the Democrats (hence the legal attack against him).

If Campbell wins the primary I will vote for him.

My wife and I voted for Delay on Friday.

47 posted on 02/26/2006 10:51:35 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson