Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Louisiana law permissive on deadly force
2theadvocate.com ^ | 2/26/06 | PENNY BROWN ROBERTS

Posted on 02/26/2006 5:29:26 AM PST by Ellesu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2006 5:29:28 AM PST by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
...the ground as a dangerous weapon that can commit great bodily harm...

Yeah, and them damn SUVs run around on the ground too.

2 posted on 02/26/2006 5:40:35 AM PST by CPOSharky (They don't even like each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
People also can shoot intruders inside a home, business or car even if there is no such threat — and need not make any effort to retreat.

And why the hell should I retreat from a criminal? It's 'academics' like this that has led to the pussification of America.

Retreat from a criminal, how absurd.

3 posted on 02/26/2006 5:43:46 AM PST by CrawDaddyCA (There is no such thing as a fair fight. Thou shall win at all costs!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky

Well, if the attacker is about to push you off a 10 story building, I figure the ground is about as dangerous as things get. It ain't the fall, it's the sudden stop.


4 posted on 02/26/2006 5:47:59 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

The Baton Rouge chapter of the NAACP wants the U.S. Justice Department to conduct an independent investigation into the death of George Temple II, killed by a witness during a scuffle with a Baton Rouge police officer Friday.


5 posted on 02/26/2006 5:48:12 AM PST by hueyblarg (Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think that you are facing a contradiction, check your prem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Probably one of the few times the word businessman is used in an article with the intent of painting the "perpetrator," as defined by another, in a favorable color. There was a study in the recent past done by a group that found nefarious businessmen had replaced blacks as a group disproportionately portrayed in unfavorable colors in movies and on TV...but then again, maybe the use of businessman is being used with negative connotations.
6 posted on 02/26/2006 5:51:01 AM PST by Simo Hayha (An eduction is incomplete without instruction in the use of arms to defend against harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hueyblarg
Ironically, despite the liberal self-defense laws, New Orleans had the highest homicide rate in the country in 2005, for cities over 250,000. Whole lot of killin' goin' on down in the Big Easy.
7 posted on 02/26/2006 5:52:16 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
And why the hell should I retreat from a criminal?

Amen to that! Thank goodness that in these parts, the perps rights end when he crosses the threshold. Once the door is locked and the alarm is set, anything coming through a door or window is considered a target.

8 posted on 02/26/2006 6:00:57 AM PST by wheelright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Deadly force in Virginia: Deadly force cannot be used in self defense unless there is a reasonable fear that the person is in danger of being killed or suffering great bodily harm. Being nearly 60 years old, I reasonably believe that “great bodily harm” will result from just about any use of force against me. If I am protecting another person from death of great bodily harm I reasonably believe that if the assailant is using anything other than verbal threats great bodily harm may result.


9 posted on 02/26/2006 6:02:24 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Bill Makes Deadly Force Legal When Defending Property (South Carolina)

POSTED: 8:30 am EST February 10, 2006

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- The House has passed a bill that lets residents use deadly
force to defend their homes, businesses and vehicles against attackers
without fear of being prosecuted or sued.

The House unanimously sent the measure to the Senate Thursday.

The proposal would put into law what is already precedent through past court
cases and expands what is defendable to include businesses and vehicles.


10 posted on 02/26/2006 6:16:38 AM PST by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I'm a mere youngster (51) but I have come to the realization as I grow older that a real youngster (say 20 or so) of the relatively large variety could easily kill me with one good punch. I saw an example of exactly that on TV the other night.


11 posted on 02/26/2006 6:51:22 AM PST by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Okay, for those other states that require "retreat," if I'm in my house, where the heck am I supposed to "retreat" to? The fallout shelter I haven't dug yet? Out a window into the waiting arms of an accomplice?

No, my home IS my final retreat. That's what the four walls, door and locks are for.


12 posted on 02/26/2006 7:02:21 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People publicly has called for an independent investigation by the U.S. Justice Department...

And why does that not surprise me?

Why can't a POS just be a POS, without bringing in the color of the POS's skin?

Is that concept just too much for their feeble minds to comprehend?

It seems that the NAACP just mindlessly reacts to any incident of this nature as one that just must be, cannot be anything other than a racial discrimination situation, with the mindset that the stupid dead perp is a victim of some kind, just 'cause he's black.

13 posted on 02/26/2006 7:41:02 AM PST by OldSmaj (Hey Islam...I flushed a koran today and I let my dog pp on it first. Come get me, moon bats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Temple was not armed with his own gun, but family and friends have described him as an athlete who enjoyed boxing. Investigators have not said whether there was a struggle for Harrison’s gun, although the officer — who suffered facial contusions and possibly a broken jaw — did shoot the businessman once in the abdomen during the struggle.

“My understanding is this case is going to turn on the facts, and if the facts demonstrate that the circumstances were such that the bystander had a reasonable belief the officer was in danger of great bodily harm or possibly even death, he was entitled to use deadly force against the perpetrator,” Adams said.

“Not knowing what happened, it’s hard to make a judgment. That’s why we have the district attorney and the grand jury investigate.”

A broken jaw is not great bodily harm?


14 posted on 02/26/2006 7:42:12 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
"Temple was not armed with his own gun...."

HELLO! Was he armed or not? (stupid reporter)

"...but family and friends have described him as an athlete who enjoyed boxing."

As as a "Boxer" his fists were DEADLY Weapons.

"although the officer — who suffered facial contusions and possibly a broken jaw — did shoot the businessman perpetrator once in the abdomen during the struggle."

Okay so here we have a BOXER, still beating the crap out of cop after he was already shot ONCE in the gut. (Some "businessman". Wonder what his 'business' was, beating cops for kicks maybe?)

"Stephens ... retrieved a gun from his car after hearing Harrison yell for help. After hearing shots, he asked Temple to get off Harrison and shot him four times when Temple did not comply. Stephens again unsuccessfully ordered Temple to retreat, then fired a fatal shot into his head, investigators said."

Lemme see if I have this straight...

  1. Perpetrator who is an 'athlete' and Boxer, is beating cop
  2. Cop SHOOTS perpetrator, perp continues to beat cop (that's one hell of an 'athlete' to be able to ignore the pain from a gut shot. Can you say PCP boys and girls.)
  3. Cop yells for help, armed citizen comes to aid.
  4. Citizen orders perp to back off, but perp continues to beat cop.
  5. Citizen caps the p.o.s. to save the cop's life - maybe his too.

And the problem is exactly what..........????

15 posted on 02/26/2006 7:53:47 AM PST by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
"And the problem is exactly what..........????"

No problemo!

16 posted on 02/26/2006 8:03:58 AM PST by sinclair (It's probably a good thing I'm not in charge of stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
a businessman

He was an honor student, too, I think. Just starting to turn his life around, I believe.

17 posted on 02/26/2006 9:04:46 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

"Ironically, despite the liberal self-defense laws, New Orleans had the highest homicide rate in the country in 2005, for cities over 250,000. Whole lot of killin' goin' on down in the Big Easy."


Yeah, but the great majority of it was gang on gang or otherwise drug related.

Being able to defend yourself in your automobile, was in response to the car jackings down there, of which there were many.


18 posted on 02/26/2006 9:07:41 AM PST by nralife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Louisiana allows the use of deadly force in self-defense or defense of others to “prevent a violent or forcible felony involving danger to life or great bodily harm.” People also can shoot intruders inside a home, business or car even if there is no such threat — and need not make any effort to retreat.

Sounds similar to Texas law, although perhaps a bit more restrictive on the defender.

19 posted on 02/26/2006 11:04:43 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
But based on media reports, the lawyer contends there still may be a question as to whether five gunshots were necessary to guarantee the safety of the officer.

Well they did do that, didn't they. Given that the officer himself felt threatened enough to shoot the perp in the gut, I'd say that the citizen who came to his aid was justified in so believing.

20 posted on 02/26/2006 11:07:01 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson