Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Handing U.S. port security to UAE is terrible idea
The Columbus Dispatch ^ | 2/22/2006 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 02/25/2006 4:21:24 PM PST by SwordofTruth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 641-654 next last
To: Reaganwuzthebest
General Tommy Franks is an honorable man of principles. I seriously doubt he would lie for anyone. When I have to consider his credibility with someone such as yourself...well, is there really any comparison?

No.

101 posted on 02/25/2006 6:39:01 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

There are allies and temporary or circumstantial or provisional allies, multinational companies and state-run ones. Such distinctions could mean alot in security matters.


102 posted on 02/25/2006 6:39:47 PM PST by kcar ( Hands of blue. Two by two. Bushbots, Bushbots are after you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You might want to start asking yourself why you're on the wrong side.

No I'm beginning to think you're ALWAYS on the opposite side just for the sake of arguing. This isn't a game, many people who live near these ports are terrified and for good reason. 9/11 was not in our dreams, it happened.

103 posted on 02/25/2006 6:39:54 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Tommy Franks is retired and under no obligation to speak on the CinC's behalf...


104 posted on 02/25/2006 6:40:02 PM PST by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"No I'm beginning to think you're ALWAYS on the opposite side just for the sake of arguing."

You should so some serious self reflection on that comment.

105 posted on 02/25/2006 6:41:10 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Ahem, Diana... they're old? Not to me,...lol.. they're my peers...lol.


106 posted on 02/25/2006 6:41:19 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
The United States has approved a business deal that would turn over the operation of six major American ports to a company that is owned by the UAE

Thomas is stuck on stupid. The title of the story is not supported in the body.

My opinion of a lot of columnists is rapidly reaching rock bottom.

107 posted on 02/25/2006 6:42:54 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

My dad was a lawyer who represented teamsters and some other some unions in Baltimore. I found a book among his things: Port of Baltimore Handbook

It is very informative about the public/private cooperation between the Maryland Port Authority - a government entity who OWNS the land on which the docks, piers, cranes, warehouses, rail terminals, etc are built, and the private companies who operate terminal facilities all along the waterfront.

It was published in 1971 - ancient history - container ports were just getting going . Baltimore had nine terminals operated by more than nine different companies; the largest was Sea-Land. Remember them? Most of the others were either railways or local companies.

This is a quote:

But while the semi-autonomous agency [MPA} carries out its mandate to provide the coordination, leadership and direction needed to keep Maryland's maritime interests at the fore, the Port of Baltimore continues to rely on its inherent resources -- the steamship companies and their agents, stevedoring firms, pier operators, Maritime Exchange, tug-boat companies, line handlers and foreign freight forwarders -- the all-important private sector that has made it what it is today. In the best American tradition, the Maryland Port Authority, as an arm of the government, simply provides the stimulus, encouragement and guidance.

In the margin of this paragraph my dad has written -- LABOR. I'm sure he was notating the list of so many different kinds of jobs that are ongoing in our ports.

All of these workers have a vested interest in not participating in a terror attack, and I wish the naysayers would at least try to understand that fact.


108 posted on 02/25/2006 6:43:04 PM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
General Tommy Franks is an honorable man of principles.

And so is Cal Thomas and many others who are raising legitimate concerns you so sarcastically dismiss. Tommy Franks is one man with an opinion who could be wrong, he's not God.

109 posted on 02/25/2006 6:43:24 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: maica
"In the margin of this paragraph my dad has written -- LABOR."

That is an excellent find. Your father recognized something a lot of people can't.

110 posted on 02/25/2006 6:45:39 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

For sure.

Someone on this thread was describing how Arabic speaking stevedores would be taking over our freight-handling facilities.


111 posted on 02/25/2006 6:46:12 PM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"And so is Cal Thomas and many others who are raising legitimate concerns ..."

Thomas claims that the ports would be turned over to DPW...that is not legitmate.

112 posted on 02/25/2006 6:47:11 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
Not even close. No peanuts here and never will be.

Take a re-gander at the presidents state of the union address and read what he said about isolationism:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/index.html

"In this decisive year, you and I will make choices that determine both the future and the character of our country. We will choose to act confidently in pursuing the enemies of freedom -- or retreat from our duties in the hope of an easier life. We will choose to build our prosperity by leading the world economy -- or shut ourselves off from trade and opportunity. In a complex and challenging time, the road of isolationism and protectionism may seem broad and inviting -- yet it ends in danger and decline. The only way to protect our people, the only way to secure the peace, the only way to control our destiny is by our leadership -- so the United States of America will continue to lead. (Applause.) "

We need to get on with transcending isolationism and protectionism, supporting the Dubai/P&O deal is just the beginning. It is the beginning of our conquest of Islamofascism using cheap transport and the produce of America and the products of US companies.

113 posted on 02/25/2006 6:47:17 PM PST by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kcar

Yeah, but by which side!


114 posted on 02/25/2006 6:47:57 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You should so some serious self reflection on that comment.

There's no reason to reflect, I've seen your posts for the last several years.

Do you live near any of these ports, yes or no? If not then please don't tell us everything's going to be ok, "trust us". One man and his career does not my loyalty or blind trust make.

115 posted on 02/25/2006 6:48:32 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"There's no reason to reflect..."

LOL! For someone who jumps into the middle of a thread and starts arguing that I'm always arguing the other side? Yes, don't self reflect on that silliness...it's too funny.

"Do you live near any of these ports, yes or no?"

Yes or no? Do you train dogs or have you been trained to respond to commands? But what the heck...

Yes I do live in one of those cities. In fact, during my over 30 years in the Coast Guard, much of which was spent in port operations, port security and MDZ planning, I lived in many of those ports.

116 posted on 02/25/2006 6:52:46 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Well...then I'll listen to YOU argue politics as I fall asleep under the kitchen table. I'm an "Old Soul." Does that count? Mom always said that I was "born a 'Little Old Lady.'" :)

It's such a fond memory. I mean, how many of us had parents that would let us fall asleep under the table while they played cards, drank, smoked, argued politics, etc. These days, they'd all be hauled into Social Services for "abusing" us. *Snort*

Times have changed. Too much, sometimes, I think. Kids just don't know what they're missing these days! ;)


117 posted on 02/25/2006 6:54:08 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Good quote. It is reassuring that he knows not to be swayed by so-called polls and public opinion, but is keeping his focus on the vision and the mission.


118 posted on 02/25/2006 6:54:58 PM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Thomas claims that the ports would be turned over to DPW...that is not legitmate.

They are taking over a portion of the management duties and will have access to valuable information regarding port operations that terrorist infiltrators could use. It is ludicrous to suggest that the potential for that happening doesn't exist, it does and I see no big deal in everyone taking a long deep breath, cooling off and letting Congress take a look at this for the next few months.

119 posted on 02/25/2006 6:56:33 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

The only thing the will manage is a commercial business, nothing more. The operation of the port, including the security of the port, remains in the hands of the proper authorities. It is ludicrouse to suggest different.


120 posted on 02/25/2006 6:58:17 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 641-654 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson