Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

>>>I was quite surprised and dissapointed to see him so vehemently defend the port deal that he didn't even see before hand.

Please don't insult our collective intelligence by trying to twist his words; he did NOT defend the deal before he was brought up to speed on what was going on. >>>

Excuse me, but he did defend a deal he did not know about until AFTER the fact. Don't twist MY words.


106 posted on 02/25/2006 4:53:10 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: sandbar
Excuse me, but he did defend a deal he did not know about until AFTER the fact.

That is just an out and out lie.

But you just keep saying it.

107 posted on 02/25/2006 4:55:55 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: sandbar
"Excuse me, but he did defend a deal he did not know about until AFTER the fact. Don't twist MY words."

Excuse me? Even if President Bush did know about the "deal" he could not reveal the details of it because the process conducted by the CFIUS was required by the Exon-Florio Amendment to be top secret. Any talk about those proceedings would be an impeachable offense. Let's stop being stuck on stupid, shift gears, and move this "deal" forward.

113 posted on 02/25/2006 5:09:47 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson