Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The really damning part:

Clarke Visited UAE

Footnotes spell out more details. One names the “UAE official” Clarke called: “NSC memo, Clarke, secure teleconference between UAE Chief of Staff Muhammad bin Zayid and Clarke, Mar. 7, 1999.”

Another notes that Joint Chiefs deputy operations director Maher was incredulous the CIA would approve this call: “Maher told us he thinks it ‘almost impossible’ that the CIA cleared Clarke’s call.”

Another indicates Clarke had been in the UAE just before the contemplated strike at bin Laden and had been assured by both bin Zayid and Dubai’s leader, Sheikh Muhammad bin Rashid, that the UAE would help the U.S. against bin Laden. Bin Zayid even insisted UAE officials were not in Afghanistan, even though it turned out that the UAE chief of staff himself had gone hunting in Afghanistan at about the same time as the contemplated U.S. attacks. The commission said:

“Days before overhead imagery confirmed the location of the hunting camp, Clarke had returned from a visit to the UAE … His visit included one-on-one meetings with Army Chief of Staff bin Zayid, as well as talks with Sheikh Muhammad bin Rashid, the ruler of Dubai. Both agreed to try to work with the United States in their efforts against Bin Laden. … On February 10, as the United States considered striking the camp, Clarke reported that during his visit bin Zayid had vehemently denied rumors that high-level UAE officials were in Afghanistan. … Subsequent reporting, however, suggested that high-level UAE officials had indeed been at the desert camp. CIA memo, ‘Recent High Level UAE Visits to Afghanistan,’ Feb. 19, 1999. Gen. Shelton also told us that his UAE counterpart said he had been hunting at a desert camp in Afghanistan at about this time.”

Another footnote says that talking points prepared for DCI Tenet that March mention “the UAE being ‘tipped off’ to the CIA’s knowledge of the camp.”

Richard Clarke believed the UAE was a counter-terrorism ally then. Bush believes it now. Clarke apparently was fooled. But that, at least, was before 9/11.

1 posted on 02/24/2006 10:05:22 AM PST by bigsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: bigsky

Rumor and hearsay. Seems the Port Deal foes are getting desperate.


2 posted on 02/24/2006 10:05:59 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr; DTogo; AZ_Cowboy; Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Spiff; Pelham; Das Outsider; ...

ping


3 posted on 02/24/2006 10:06:42 AM PST by Stellar Dendrite (UAE-- Anti-Israel and funds CAIR, check my homepage for more info)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

Looks like some will have to face the fact that their claims that the uproar was dying down and would disappear were all just fantasy.


4 posted on 02/24/2006 10:06:56 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

You DO reallize the really damning fact is it MAY NOT be true. That is the problem with these sort of Tin Foil Hat smear jobs. They all rely on the reading ASSUMING things with no FACTS verify the Writer's assumption. I say this is complete BS made up by the Writer. Prove me wrong.


7 posted on 02/24/2006 10:08:30 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

The title of this article should be "Did Richard Clarke Save Bin Ladin".


8 posted on 02/24/2006 10:08:54 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

Richard Clarke...LMAO!!! What an incompetent bastard with no integrity.


9 posted on 02/24/2006 10:09:07 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
most importantly, Richard Clarke

Most importantly? I stopped reading right there. This guy thinks he's Jack Bauer but he'd be lucky to be Maxwell Smart.

11 posted on 02/24/2006 10:10:20 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
Congress must demand testimony from every person named in. those pages and the footnotes. That includes:...

I notice one prominent name not listed............ Bill Clinton

12 posted on 02/24/2006 10:11:33 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Things turn out best, for those who make the best of the way things turn out.--- Jack Buck (RIP))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
In early 1999, the Clinton Administration wanted to fire missiles at bin Laden without risking civilian casualties.

I really doubt this part.

16 posted on 02/24/2006 10:12:34 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (i'd rather hunt with Cheney than drive with Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

We have found an issue that will coalesce into a great alliance of yahoos and kneejerks from both parties.

And we'll call it the Mullets and Moonbats party.


17 posted on 02/24/2006 10:12:37 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

We're taking anything Richard Clarke the proven liar says seriously? At any rate, at best this is a circumstantial case even if true.


20 posted on 02/24/2006 10:14:02 AM PST by MikeA (New York owes America an apology for Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

Well, the first tipster was Clark. He tipped the UAE.


26 posted on 02/24/2006 10:16:58 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

I am going to say it now, and I know what it sounds like.

My gut tells me that Clarke himself provided the tip-off, either unwillingly as a naive dupe of his UAE "connections", or, yes, willingly. I have always seen him as very duplicitious, and now one of his supporters, Madeline Halfbright, heads one of the lobbyist groups pushing for approval of the UAE port deal.

It all does not smell right and we all know the nest of vipers that exists in the permanent government at State and DOD, who are the underlings who approved the deal.


27 posted on 02/24/2006 10:17:45 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
"Clarke had been in the UAE just before the contemplated strike at bin Laden and had been assured by both bin Zayid and Dubai’s leader, Sheikh Muhammad bin Rashid, that the UAE would help the U.S. against bin Laden. Bin Zayid even insisted UAE officials were not in Afghanistan, even though it turned out that the UAE chief of staff himself had gone hunting in Afghanistan at about the same time as the contemplated U.S. attacks."

This shows just how stupid Clarke and the Clintonistas were/are: if they really wanted to get Bin Laden, they would have obliterated everyone and everything in that camp and then said to any UAE protest, "but Sheikh Bin Zayid ASSURED us there could be no UAE officials present at that camp!!" The UAE gave us perfect cover for doing the strike and pleading ignorance, but the Clintonistas just couldn't pull the trigger. As for Clarke's tipping off Bin Laden via the UAE, Clarke is obviously a moron and the fact that this guy was a key US counter-terrorism official for years is very scary.
39 posted on 02/24/2006 10:28:50 AM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

SLICK WILLIE allowed OBL to escape. Several times.


44 posted on 02/24/2006 10:46:35 AM PST by OldFriend (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
Another terrorism fiasco brought to you by double-o Richard Clarke.
47 posted on 02/24/2006 10:47:53 AM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

so basically, Clark blem the deal.......what an A##.


48 posted on 02/24/2006 10:48:17 AM PST by vin-one (REMEMBER the WTC !!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

Sure, let's turn over management of our ports to a country that protected Bin Laden. That works.


54 posted on 02/24/2006 11:09:06 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky

No the REALLY REALLY damning line is -

"may have ***inadvertently*** saved bin Laden"

If this is the judging criteria look no further than Leaky Lehey and others in gov't who leak on purpose!


69 posted on 02/24/2006 12:00:55 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigsky
Wow, the Richard Clarke? Isn't he one of the "Brokeback Mountain" boys?
71 posted on 02/24/2006 12:02:19 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson