Posted on 02/24/2006 10:05:16 AM PST by bigsky
Well then, I will await your clarification with baited breath.
Which is it? Option 1, or option 2.
Of course I know what your choice is...Bush is all evil.
Cute. Now that you've answered your own question...answer mine or just admit that you can't without looking stupid.
And try to compete with how stupid you look. No thanks, I'll stick with the only answer that is qualified...that DP World is already providing these services for our troops.
Read it before you mock it.
No thanks, you read it. No self respecting American would put one ounce of credibility in anything that came out that farce..
"Rumor and hearsay. Seems the Port Deal foes are getting desperate."
Clearly. And if I intended to side with them, I would visit the DU.
No the REALLY REALLY damning line is -
"may have ***inadvertently*** saved bin Laden"
If this is the judging criteria look no further than Leaky Lehey and others in gov't who leak on purpose!
Exxon, Sasol, Shell, KBR and the UAE?
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Why? If there was ever a national embarassment, it was the 9-11 Commission. Cobbled together by Clintonistas, its makeup ensured its irrelevance. Jamie Gorelick, who smirked after anything an "R" or anyone who placed ANY blame or responsibility on Clinton, is as much a cause of 9-11 as the hijackers were. Worse, I "watched in amazement" when Bob Kerrey berated Condi Rice for "Putting a Christian army into Muslim Iraq". The Commission, its members, findings and conclusions are as irrelevant is Tom Daschle. The very presence of the two abovementioned in this circus was insulting to America, and Im really sorry to see it posted here in an attempt to sway opinion on the Port debate.
This administration has done nothing but praise the 9/11 commission. If I missed otherwise, post it.
W thinks Islam is a religion of peace, of course he is going to praise it. Honest and reasonable Americans saw the Comm for what it was-an absolute circus. But if you want to inject more irrationality into an already irrational debate, perhaps you should review the hearings. Im confident if you watch them again you see the Commission's true purpose-deflect blame away from Clinton, and pile it on W in the run up to 2004. As I said, Im really sorry to see it referred to here..
Bin Laden visited London in 1994 and lived for a few months in Wembley establishing the committee.
Intersting how that commission seemed to be organized crass political posturing. Kind of like this whole fabricated non-issue.
Ok.. I will play. It is called supporting our President and Commander and Chief and trusting him. He knows what he is doing - he has proven that and his detractors do not have a clue they have proven that.
Now align yourselves as you will- I am hanging out with the GW.
The answer is "NO" thanks for asking.
Did lamebrain Clinton officials blow or sluf off every chance to kill or capture Osama? YES
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.