Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush is about to fritter away his party's last advantage.
Washington Times ^ | February 24, 2006 | Wes Pruden

Posted on 02/24/2006 4:57:39 AM PST by When_Penguins_Attack

George W. Bush is about to fritter away his party's last advantage. What Republicans have had going for them is that they aren't Democrats. Over the past few days we've seen the men at the top of the Grumpy Old Party drifting toward something that looks suspiciously like an Old Boys' Party. When he hears applause only from Jimmy Carter, who gave away the Panama Canal (now controlled by the Chinese), and Bill Clinton, his newly adopted little brother, George W. should be looking for the panic button. Once they're no longer regarded as the toughest party on national security the Republicans will be burnt toast.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushbotattack; bushbots; ports; wespruden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-391 next last
To: LS

I disagree with your assessment that no one cares about the ports issue. My husband is apolitical, (gotta love him), and he likes to post to woodworking sites, his hobby. He says there are many off topic comments about this issue and the general consensus is that UAE should not get control of the ports, or at least it merits more than a rubber stamp. Some long time Bush fans are also losing faith in W, and this will rub off in a bad way on the party.


81 posted on 02/24/2006 5:43:45 AM PST by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

As was stated before we are not selling our ports.!!!!!!


82 posted on 02/24/2006 5:43:55 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Why don't you add the UAE's chief lobbyist, Bob Dole, to that list?

Bob Dole is the most Establishment Republican around.

83 posted on 02/24/2006 5:44:14 AM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

That's true.

But I don't presume we should abandon trying to educate people in the middle, do we? Let's see: there is 25% of population who are Bush hating wing of the Left and 35% of conservatives. All the rest claim to be in the middle. I would not put a bet based on the polls, but they DO give some information. In this case is that there is a 20-30% swing in public opinion. The left has an advantage of having MSM on their side, so its is an uphill battle for conservatives, but it is a battle worth fighting.

Nobody can withstand being compared to Churchill, but we should not forget that he was fighting fascism with actions AND the words, and in his case, its hard to tell which was more important.


84 posted on 02/24/2006 5:45:07 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paige
Amen and Amen !!!! Wes Pruden does NOT speak for me or millions of Americans who do support the President.

I knew they'd show up.

If Ronald Reagan himself was critical of Your Glorious Leader, you'd turn on the Gipper.

I hate cults of personality.

85 posted on 02/24/2006 5:46:16 AM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne

All very valid.


86 posted on 02/24/2006 5:46:28 AM PST by IrishMike (Dry Powder is a plus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: When_Penguins_Attack

I normally agree entirely with Wes Pruden. Here I don't. The UAE is literally next door to Iran, with which we have a deadly serious dispute about nukes and against which we are probably going to have to take some really serious military action sooner than later. The UAE has consistently supported our military actions in the Persian Gulf. If we find it necessary to take military action against Iran its support will be essential. Indeed, I would not be at all surprised if Bush has already been discussing such activity with UAE representatives. Doing this port deal is a very good way to lock in that alliance and enable us to protect ourselves against the growing Iranian nuclear threat.

I initially thought the port deal was a terribly bad idea. However, I changed my mind on seeing some posts here and thinking about the strategic implications I've discussed above.


87 posted on 02/24/2006 5:48:12 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I'll leave Oz up to you folks. I'll hang my hat on General Franks...he has real knowledge and no political agenda.


88 posted on 02/24/2006 5:48:32 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Well Reagan did not avenge our Marines. At least Bush is not afraid to go to war for us. I am not a Bushbot, but will stand up for anyone that I think is right on an issue.
89 posted on 02/24/2006 5:49:13 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Do a google search "mexican customs facility". Or go to www.kcsmartport.com.


90 posted on 02/24/2006 5:49:42 AM PST by Lobbyist (I want my American dream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse; ARCADIA
>>>People like you make me wish that willful stupidity caused physical pain.<<<<<

Bravo, now an intelligent conversation is starting to head south like a DU love fest. Thanks
91 posted on 02/24/2006 5:49:49 AM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

You mean the way some people are quick to forget that DP World and Dubai are critical elements in the logistics support for our troops fighting the war? Or how we trust them to provide services and support for the largest contingent of U.S. Navy vessels outside the U.S...including our European so-called friends?

@@@@

What you wrote so clearly should be obvious to every politician and rational thinker. What you wrote is the very reason that CFIUS participants did not see red flags when asked to vet the sale of the port operations to DPW.

They already are looking after our security interests in a major way! I really am despairing at the shortsighted reactions to having this company involved in some American ports.

I am convinced that the major objections started with the waterfront unions, who do not want an employer noted for modernization and efficiency.


92 posted on 02/24/2006 5:51:23 AM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: When_Penguins_Attack

Yep many of them are already drinking their Koolaid.

I don't mind calm discussion, but talking with these people is tantamount to trying to talk to a spoiled 5 year old that has been told no.

If the UAE deal is such a good deal for America, then do your best to convince me of it. Preferably without losing your temper.


93 posted on 02/24/2006 5:51:39 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Well Reagan did not avenge our Marines.

Perhaps.

But he did cause Communism to collapse.

And I think that counts for something.

94 posted on 02/24/2006 5:52:52 AM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: maica

It did start from the labor unions, spread to slick chucky schumer and the Bush is all evil crowd were quick to adopt it as their own cause of the week.


95 posted on 02/24/2006 5:52:55 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Selling them, leasing terminals, whatever--all the confusion over the nature of this deal underscores the point I was really trying to make. We don't know enough about this deal to decide whether it makes sense or not. Why not "slow the train down" until we know more about it? That, to me, is the issue. As I said before, I haven't decided whether I support the deal or not. I'm trying to take an informed position and I don't know enough about it yet. I care enough about my country and its security to give this deal some serious consideration. There's nothing wrong with that.


96 posted on 02/24/2006 5:53:10 AM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: When_Penguins_Attack
"I wish we had Republican leadership who believed in something besides being in power."

'THE' Republican Leader [George W. Bush] does believe in his principles [vs. power] and that is why he is constantly under some kind of attack.

97 posted on 02/24/2006 5:53:46 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I hate cults of personality.

Pretty broad brush there, huh Laz? Are you saying the only possible motivation for supporting the deal is bush-botism?

Full disclosure: I haven't taken sides in this yet, because I don't like to spout off in subject matters I know nothing about.

But either FR has a lot of global shipping magnates and port administrators (with a few longshoremen thrown in), or a lot of people (on both sides) are spouting off about things they know little about.

98 posted on 02/24/2006 5:54:05 AM PST by Warren_Piece (Smart is easy. Good is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
21 or six, makes no difference since it only involves commercial port operations and doesn't impact security.

Why don't we let them manage the White House and the Capital building too. After all the Coast Guard will still be there so you can remain nice and cozy behind your assumptions.
99 posted on 02/24/2006 5:55:12 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
If that is the case (I don't think it is) it means Rush is absolutely right, that this only STRENGTHENS Bush's position, because it becomes even clearer that the Dems are not, and have never been, interested in our security. Either way, Bush and the GOP win.

It was like Kerry trying to run as a "war hero": He was damned if he did, because it only reinforced the notion that there is a war out there, and damned if he didn't because then only one guy was "fighting" the war, Bush.

100 posted on 02/24/2006 5:55:25 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson