[Fishrrman]

The thought has occurred to me that if the (soon-to-be) future administration of Hillary Clinton had done this deal, those who are pro-administration in this debate would be screaming - let me restate that for emphasis: SCREAMING - that it was a sellout of national security.

Just as they did (and justifiably so) when it was discovered how the previous Clinton administration had sold nuclear technology to China and North Korea.

The port sellout is a bad idea, regardless of which administration does it. Why the rush to get it done? Why NOT have an open investigation as to what might really be going on here?

Sold down the river. Don't matter who does the sellin', you're headin' down the river anyway.

- John

[CWOJackson]

"The port sellout is a bad idea..."

No port is being sold. Some commercial enterprises located within some ports is being sold but port security will not change.

[Dane]

The thought has occurred to me that if the (soon-to-be) future administration of Hillary Clinton had done this deal, those who are pro-administration in this debate would be screaming - let me restate that for emphasis: SCREAMING - that it was a sellout of national security

Actually if hillary was in power(shudder) the chicomms would have gotten a sweetheart deal. You know China a country that has nuclear weapons and is not an ally on the WOT.