Why? I seldom listen to Limbaugh and I don't get my opinions from him. I don't know what his motivations are. None of us do. But it's not evil to be suspicious of his reasons. He quite openly talked of having dinner with some Repubs the last time I heard him. Motivation is everything and we don't know what his are. I don't find questioning his that awful. I don't know a single Freeper that actually blindly follows a politician as the Dems do. So I'm finding the angst on these threads disturbing. Names like "bot" and "basher" do none of us a service. Anyway, I find no sin in questioning someones motives.
Maybe to state facts and not hysteria, what a concept.
Does that really seem harmless to you? Really?
(Please note that I am a Rush listener, but I disagree with him quite often).
What I am asking is........why are you questioning me about calling someone else on what I believe to be completely irresponsible attacks on someone like Rush, or the President, when you don't seem to have a problem with those who are doing the attacking?
What is the standard here? They are permitted to say anything, and I am not permitted to challenge them, and say what I think? I'm really curious as to the rules of this 'game' you are playing....