To: From many - one.
Because a frog gets longer legs is not a sign of evolution. If a frog looked at the human race would he make the same assumption about the 7 foot basketball player?
53 posted on
02/23/2006 4:49:57 PM PST by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: taxesareforever
Seven foot humans are the result of evolution. Did you believe they were specially designed to entertain the designer?
54 posted on
02/23/2006 4:53:00 PM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: taxesareforever
Because a frog gets longer legs is not a sign of evolution.
It is if the legs are longer as a result of longer-legged offspring having better reproductive success.
Just what do you think that evolution states?
56 posted on
02/23/2006 4:56:25 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: taxesareforever
It is becoming ever more clear that your entire body of knowledge about evolution consists of the word and your opposition.
Both the longer legged frog feature and the earlier birthing squirrel feature are classic evolutionary changes.
Oh, yes, as are taller human sub populations.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson