CNN's Cafferty Highlights Calls for Bush'sImpeachment Over Ports

Media Research ^ | February 22, 2006

[MJY1288]

LOL, you are quoting the Talk show host on MSNBC's Scarborough show, and you know it!

After 9/11 lots of things changed, and especially after how quickly the Taliban and Saddam Hussein were overthrown v ery quickly. Despite your ignorance on this matter, many of these Middle Eastern Countries are more interested in making money than declaring Jihad and its obvious that the UAE is one of them.

[sinkspur]

We get Arab support in the WOT not because they like or love us but because they fear us.

The UAE is a very practical, free market country. They realize that working with us benefits them in lots of ways.

[abigailsmybaby]

Commies in left coast ports, Muslims in eastern ports and southern ports, wide open borders north and south. From where I stand I think we're well surrounded, but this impeachment sh!t is really gettin' old.

[nopardons]

Actually, it's how the FFs saw most of the populace.

The more things change, the more they remain the same, dear.

[napscoordinator]

You haven't been paying attention. This is not just Democrats, I dare say most of the criticism is from Republicans. Republicans like me.


You are right that we are criticizing this port deal, but we are not calling for impeachment like this wack job. I know that you are not thinking that either.

[daybreakcoming]

No Stuart, not everyone here was against it. Some silly people decided to see what the facts really were before making up their minds. Imagine that. You know, we always accused the DU types of kneejerking and going on their "feelings" while Conservatives dealt with facts. And as Howlin said, some others who thought your way have now changed as the facts become better known. I hope you will study it some more. Have a good night.

[Stuart Scott]

http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing8/9-11Commission_Hearing_2004-03-23.pdf

[Darkwolf377]

Thanks, will check it out.

[Stuart Scott]

That's extremely rude. The class system at this site is amazing. How long does one have to be coming to this site before their opinion matters?

[BigSkyFreeper]

How recent does this have to be? Shortly before 9/11, we were prevented from attacking Bin Laden because UAE officials were visiting him.

That was Clintoon. Clintoon passed at the chance of apprehending OBL three times when OBL's head was offered to Clintoon on a silver platter.

Clintoon governed by push polls, Bush just does what he believes in his heart of hearts is right.

I've read that several places today and I'm pretty sure I remember reading about that in the 9/11 Report.

Then you're reading revisionist history, and I personally wouldn't take stock in the 9/11 Report.

[nopardons]

CCP the source. Nobody is going to take your word for that. And WHO said it, some uninformed yahoo?

[Stuart Scott]

Check this out and visit its various links. I know it's a blog, but it links to many credible sites, including the 9/11 Report:

http://www.madcowprod.com/11122004issue.html

[Howlin]

Shortly before 9/11, we were prevented from attacking Bin Laden because UAE officials were visiting him.

Three years is "shortly before?"

[Stuart Scott]

Privately owned British company =/= Company owned by a nation with ties to terrorism

[nopardons]

First of all, the president didn't have anything at all to do with the deal.

Secondly, it isn't up to him to stop it.

Thirdly, I suggest that you read up on the facts of this entire matter; right now.

[nhoward14]

Okay. I admit it. I wait for Rush to tell me what to think. Once he tells me what to think, I am set for the day.

Rush says the UAE deal is good, so it must be good.

The enemies of Rush will be crushed in the ratings!

[Muleteam1]

I was opposed to this proposal when I first heard about it and posted my objection here on FR. However, as I have learned more about this I see no real problem. It will essentially change little except to place the UAE in ownership of a few port terminals. With all the hoopla though, the President will have a difficult time getting this through without extensive explanation to the public and to the Republicans in Congress. The Dems could care less about national security as they don't even recognize an enemy. They are simply opposed to anything Bush is for.

Also, if Webster's dictionary included a picture of an old fool, Jack Cafferty's picture would be there. His picture would also be found under jacka__.

Muleteam1

[Stuart Scott]

Just do a search for "uae."