Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
I was opposed to this proposal when I first heard about it and posted my objection here on FR. However, as I have learned more about this I see no real problem. It will essentially change little except to place the UAE in ownership of a few port terminals. With all the hoopla though, the President will have a difficult time getting this through without extensive explanation to the public and to the Republicans in Congress. The Dems could care less about national security as they don't even recognize an enemy. They are simply opposed to anything Bush is for.

Also, if Webster's dictionary included a picture of an old fool, Jack Cafferty's picture would be there. His picture would also be found under jacka__.

Muleteam1

79 posted on 02/22/2006 9:32:40 PM PST by Muleteam1 (MEDIA-CRITY - news of low quality and low value and that which assumes consumers are brainless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Muleteam1

Great Post, I share your experience over this issue


95 posted on 02/22/2006 9:39:32 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson