Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Cafferty Highlights Calls for Bush'sImpeachment Over Ports
Media Research ^ | February 22, 2006

Posted on 02/22/2006 9:00:17 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last
To: Stuart Scott
What has happened on this site in the past day? When this first broke, everyone was against it.

We got the FACTS; perhaps you should, too.

21 posted on 02/22/2006 9:12:17 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I call them as I see them.


22 posted on 02/22/2006 9:12:51 PM PST by Stuart Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onyx
He's just a hysterical old left-winged crank.


23 posted on 02/22/2006 9:13:40 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"We now have help in closing down Guantanamo Bay."

Knuckle-draggers like Cafferty want to close down Gitmo, close down Abu Ghraib, stop screening at airports but, he'll spit in the face of the only country who is actually working to help stop terrorism and stop their American workers from managing the paperwork at US ports.

Xenophobic numb-nuts.

24 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:00 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stuart Scott


That's readily apparent.

Blind leading the blind.


25 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:05 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I'm so sick of that term. "Knee-jerk." It's used whenever Bush does something monumentally stupid and people on this site speak out against it before Rush has his say. Please tell me how it makes sense that a foreign entity with known ties to terrorism should be able to control ports in the United States.


26 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:16 PM PST by Stuart Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper


Whatever...lol.


27 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:52 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lp boonie
Iraq had no ties with terrorists so impeach Bush. UAE, one of our most valued allies (next to Kuwait) in the Middle East has ties with terrorists so impeach Bush.

Perfect.

Cafferty actually made the comment "If this sale goes through, we deserve whatever we get."

Those opposed to this sale (not me) say we are setting ourselves up for a nuke, so I guess Cafferty thinks we deserve getting nuked.

28 posted on 02/22/2006 9:14:59 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Dubai-u's fault--The Port Non-Issue is Hillary's Sistah Soulja moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stuart Scott

Yes but we don't want to impeach the president every time we disagree with him.


29 posted on 02/22/2006 9:15:07 PM PST by Daralundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Once these hearings get started and the entire country gets to see how much the UAE has been cooperating with us, those who who have been calling the UAE's a terrorist supporting Nation will look foolish (Sean Hannity)

Ask anyone in the United States Navy what there favorite Port is and 8 of 10 will tell you Dubai.

The UAE might have made some questionable decisions in the past when it comes to recognizing the Taliban, but WTF, We were the Taliban's number one supporter when it comes to humanitarian aid, (Democrats made a big deal about this before we removed them from power as they objected to the U.S. invading Afghanistan). The last point is this... If we stop this deal, the most likely company to replace DPW will be an Indonesian Company.

I think once all the propaganda clears (that Chuck Schumer initiated) calms down, we will see just how much the UAE has been our friend since 9/11.

30 posted on 02/22/2006 9:15:21 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Also, I find it offensive that you characterize the American people as "dumb-as-stumps." Sounds like something Michael Moore would say himself...


31 posted on 02/22/2006 9:15:39 PM PST by Stuart Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stuart Scott
The UAE has known ties to Bin Laden for crying out loud.

Now? Show me some proof.

When this first broke, everyone was against it. Really, it seemed like everyone. But then Rush starts blabbing about it and now most people are suddenly for it? Whatever...

No, some of us actually investigated what this deal was about, and now see that it is totally innocuous.

Most of those who oppose it are ill-informed or simply using anti-Arab sentiment for political gain.

32 posted on 02/22/2006 9:16:12 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Looks like it.


33 posted on 02/22/2006 9:16:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

I don't think we should either. Cafferty is a moron. However, I couldn't let some of the comments in this thread go unchallenged.


34 posted on 02/22/2006 9:16:28 PM PST by Stuart Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: onyx

He solidified his left-winged lunacy by excusing the appalling incompetancy and apparent corruption of the Lousiana state officials like the Governor Blanco and Schoolbus Nagin after Katrina.


35 posted on 02/22/2006 9:17:23 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Cafferty When talking to Wolf Blitzer: "We now have help in closing down Guantanamo Bay."

All day people have been saying to those on my side of this debate 'You agree with Jimmy Carter!'

I'd rather have that useless, and ultimately harmless nuisance, on "my side" than be on the side of idiots like Hillary, Chuckie, and this guy, who are taken seriously, are in the current media, and are shaping opinion. Jimmy only talks to the converted; Cafferty talks to...

Well, Wolf Blitzer and their families, who are probably 50% of the CNN audience...

But, you know what I mean!

36 posted on 02/22/2006 9:17:42 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Dubai-u's fault--The Port Non-Issue is Hillary's Sistah Soulja moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

How recent does this have to be? Shortly before 9/11, we were prevented from attacking Bin Laden because UAE officials were visiting him. I've read that several places today and I'm pretty sure I remember reading about that in the 9/11 Report.


37 posted on 02/22/2006 9:18:01 PM PST by Stuart Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: onyx

LOL, No truer words have been spoken :-)


38 posted on 02/22/2006 9:18:02 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Stuart Scott
Please tell me how it makes sense that a foreign entity with known ties to terrorism should be able to control ports in the United States.

Where's the proof of CURRENT ties to terrorism in the UAE?

And, as a sign you're ill-informed, DPW will not be "controlling" ports. They'll be managing terminals at the ports.

39 posted on 02/22/2006 9:18:44 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Politicians across the political spectrum are raising their voices against the arrangement which would allow a United Arab Emirates company to manage six U.S. seaports, and on Tuesday's Situation Room, CNN's Jack Cafferty acted as a rabble-rousing activist as he encouraged his viewers to rise up against any politician who doesn't act to block the deal and he highlighted two viewer e-mails which advocated the impeachment of President Bush over the matter.

I ask any thinking person, how is GWB doing anything that meets an impeachable offense? His administration is following the laws enacted by Congress for CFIUS. What has he done about this port deal that warrants even discussing impeachment???

40 posted on 02/22/2006 9:19:00 PM PST by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson