Posted on 02/22/2006 6:19:30 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
Arab Co., White House Had Secret Agreement
Feb 22 9:03 PM US/Eastern
Email this story
By TED BRIDIS
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON
1d08c5bfc6d0@news.ap.org The Bush administration secretly required a company in the United Arab Emirates to cooperate with future U.S. investigations before approving its takeover of operations at six American ports, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. It chose not to impose other, routine restrictions.
As part of the $6.8 billion purchase, state-owned Dubai Ports World agreed to reveal records on demand about "foreign operational direction" of its business at U.S. ports, the documents said. Those records broadly include details about the design, maintenance or operation of ports and equipment.
The administration did not require Dubai Ports to keep copies of business records on U.S. soil, where they would be subject to court orders. It also did not require the company to designate an American citizen to accommodate U.S. government requests. Outside legal experts said such obligations are routinely attached to U.S. approvals of foreign sales in other industries.
"They're not lax but they're not draconian," said James Lewis, a former U.S. official who worked on such agreements. If officials had predicted the firestorm of criticism over the deal, Lewis said, "they might have made them sound harder."
The conditions involving the sale of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. were detailed in U.S. documents marked "confidential." Such records are regularly guarded as trade secrets, and it is highly unusual for them to be made public.
The concessions _ described previously by the Homeland Security Department as unprecedented among maritime companies _ reflect the close relationship between the United States and the United Arab Emirates.
The revelations about the negotiated conditions came as the White House acknowledged President Bush was unaware of the pending sale until the deal had already been approved by his administration.
Bush on Tuesday brushed aside objections by leaders in the Senate and House. He pledged to veto any bill Congress might approve to block the agreement, but some lawmakers said they still were determined to capsize it.
Dubai Port's top American executive, chief operating officer Edward H. Bilkey, said the company will do whatever the Bush administration asks to enhance shipping security and ensure the sale goes through. Bilkey said Wednesday he will work in Washington to persuade skeptical lawmakers they should endorse the deal; Senate oversight hearings already are scheduled.
"We're disappointed," Bikley told the AP in an interview. "We're going to do our best to persuade them that they jumped the gun. The UAE is a very solid friend, as President Bush has said."
Under the deal, the government asked Dubai Ports to operate American seaports with existing U.S. managers "to the extent possible." It promised to take "all reasonable steps" to assist the Homeland Security Department, and it pledged to continue participating in security programs to stop smuggling and detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials.
The administration required Dubai Ports to designate an executive to handle requests from the U.S. government, but it did not specify this person's citizenship.
It said Dubai Ports must retain paperwork "in the normal course of business" but did not specify a time period or require corporate records to be housed in the United States. Outside experts familiar with such agreements said such provisions are routine in other cases.
They worship $$$ so far as I see.
dig where? Care to share your sources for these "Mohammedan Executives"'s contributions to AQ?
Yeah, Mike Gallagher was having fits the other morning.
Typical jingoism and profiling. He's become almost as tedious as Lou Dobbs.
I caught the tail end of the Senate Armed Services hearing just in time to hear Hillary's statement that she is going to introduce legislation that no foreign government can have an ownership interest in our port facilities, just as they can't have an ownership interest in our airports.
Good for Hillary! (Never thought I'd say that!)
The impression I got from the answers I caught earlier is that the administration is, or believes itself to be, powerless to stop the process now and that it will go forward.
Will be interesting to see how the other committees handle this.
I agree. You cant cut deal with the A-rabs. Their words are meaningless. Cant Bush understand we demand no backdoor special deals for anyone let alone terrorist sympathizer governments.? (Yes, read the 9/11 commission report- they aint saints people)
Maybe because we're non-conformists? We don't "go along to get along."
That IS good...near Shakespearean!!
Thanks for the wake-up pings! I dreamed last night of how Billy The Kid was 'gotten rid of' by Pat Garrett, a former member of The Gang, and John Chisholm's business proposition before the Cattlemen's Assn. to hire Garrett for big bucks and a rosier future...'Let's hire a thief, to catch a thief!' We wish to be rid of kooky, 'Jihadist' Arabs for the betterment of the Iraqi people generally (and our honorable withdrawl from the fracas for US) so who better to help us than reasonable, Arab businesses with a will to live and strong financial incentives...
Do you want to start a global trade war?!
Who or what are you afraid of?
I am afraid of nobody - nonetheless, a world-wide economic recession should be avoided, if possible - now can you answer my question?
I am trying to get you to explain how requiring American ownership of sensitive assets will start a global trade war. You're the one who says it will, explain how.
I would be happy to as long as you are not some kind of wacko who actually wants to start a global trade war - in that case, I'd rather not waste any more time with you - a simple "yes" or "no" would have sufficed already.
John Chisholm addresses Al Qaida ping...
'You're all Billy The Kid, ya know. You, Bin Laden...you, Zarkawi...ALL of you. You're all Billy bastards!!
*Sigh.*
Forget it.
Hey O,
Your welcome my friend.
NSNR-THM
Just another example of the press trying to create a scandal where none exists. As Joseph Pulitzer said in 1904, "A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself..."
Or as Stalin said, if you repeat a lie often enough, people will accept it as fact. The DemoRat Party and the media are counting on it. But they are losing more votes and customers by the minute.
The amazing thing to me is how people on the conservative side believe it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.