Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arab Co., White House Had Secret Agreement
AP ^ | 2/22/06

Posted on 02/22/2006 6:19:30 PM PST by iPod Shuffle

Arab Co., White House Had Secret Agreement

Feb 22 9:03 PM US/Eastern

Email this story

By TED BRIDIS

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON

1d08c5bfc6d0@news.ap.org The Bush administration secretly required a company in the United Arab Emirates to cooperate with future U.S. investigations before approving its takeover of operations at six American ports, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. It chose not to impose other, routine restrictions.

As part of the $6.8 billion purchase, state-owned Dubai Ports World agreed to reveal records on demand about "foreign operational direction" of its business at U.S. ports, the documents said. Those records broadly include details about the design, maintenance or operation of ports and equipment.

The administration did not require Dubai Ports to keep copies of business records on U.S. soil, where they would be subject to court orders. It also did not require the company to designate an American citizen to accommodate U.S. government requests. Outside legal experts said such obligations are routinely attached to U.S. approvals of foreign sales in other industries.

"They're not lax but they're not draconian," said James Lewis, a former U.S. official who worked on such agreements. If officials had predicted the firestorm of criticism over the deal, Lewis said, "they might have made them sound harder."

The conditions involving the sale of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. were detailed in U.S. documents marked "confidential." Such records are regularly guarded as trade secrets, and it is highly unusual for them to be made public.

The concessions _ described previously by the Homeland Security Department as unprecedented among maritime companies _ reflect the close relationship between the United States and the United Arab Emirates.

The revelations about the negotiated conditions came as the White House acknowledged President Bush was unaware of the pending sale until the deal had already been approved by his administration.

Bush on Tuesday brushed aside objections by leaders in the Senate and House. He pledged to veto any bill Congress might approve to block the agreement, but some lawmakers said they still were determined to capsize it.

Dubai Port's top American executive, chief operating officer Edward H. Bilkey, said the company will do whatever the Bush administration asks to enhance shipping security and ensure the sale goes through. Bilkey said Wednesday he will work in Washington to persuade skeptical lawmakers they should endorse the deal; Senate oversight hearings already are scheduled.

"We're disappointed," Bikley told the AP in an interview. "We're going to do our best to persuade them that they jumped the gun. The UAE is a very solid friend, as President Bush has said."

Under the deal, the government asked Dubai Ports to operate American seaports with existing U.S. managers "to the extent possible." It promised to take "all reasonable steps" to assist the Homeland Security Department, and it pledged to continue participating in security programs to stop smuggling and detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials.

The administration required Dubai Ports to designate an executive to handle requests from the U.S. government, but it did not specify this person's citizenship.

It said Dubai Ports must retain paperwork "in the normal course of business" but did not specify a time period or require corporate records to be housed in the United States. Outside experts familiar with such agreements said such provisions are routine in other cases.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; nationalsecurity; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-565 next last
To: Howlin

It is addressed to the Know Nothings around here who have been accusing the Prez of treason. Are you one of them?


41 posted on 02/22/2006 6:36:29 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Thank You!


42 posted on 02/22/2006 6:36:37 PM PST by defconw (Bushbot,SnowFlake,Levinite, Dittohead,Hannitized,Member of the Dick Cheney Hunt Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Good point.


43 posted on 02/22/2006 6:36:56 PM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

You are right. There's no hurry then, eh ?


44 posted on 02/22/2006 6:38:03 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

i was commenting on the sheer number of stories coming out on this whole issue....every time you hit refresh there is something new


45 posted on 02/22/2006 6:38:05 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle; Howlin

If you only knew how funny your post is!! lol


46 posted on 02/22/2006 6:38:21 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

The reality that people have been spun and spun good by the MSM on this story is coming out in record time, i'n't it?


47 posted on 02/22/2006 6:38:21 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Dubai-u's fault--The Port Non-Issue is Hillary's Sistah Soulja moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

bttt


48 posted on 02/22/2006 6:39:19 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Rumsfeld was referring to these same conditions at yesterday's briefing - he said there was some letter outlining requirements for security . . . so much for TOP SECRET!!
49 posted on 02/22/2006 6:39:26 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Why is it that Bush is always more concerned about what the citizens of other countries think above his own ?

I voted for the man twice, went to war for his father, stood in the streets in verbal combat in support of the Iraq war...

I am justifiably uncomfortable with this situation, and I expect the president to care about me and my fellow citizens for once more than some foreigners (unlike his bungling on the southern border). This is not too much to ask. He has forgotten who put him in power, and worn out his support.

Don't like it, tough. You will lose this one...and so will Bush.

50 posted on 02/22/2006 6:39:31 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle
Are you one of them?

Are you that stupid?

51 posted on 02/22/2006 6:40:20 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
i was commenting on the sheer number of stories coming out on this whole issue....every time you hit refresh there is something new

The truth is coming out.

And the tide is turning against you.

52 posted on 02/22/2006 6:42:12 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
" am bothered when a see publicly traded utilities (and sometimes hospitals) privatized via sale or transfer of stock when the federal government (taxpayers) provided some benefit (underwriting loans, tax advantages, etc) and then a group of insiders take checks to the bank."

I live in Illinois. You mean it's not supposed to work like that?/sarcasm.

You're right: so called 'concessions' or 'franchises' run by private vendors are not usually subject to the same scrutiny as contracts where the government pays out cash instead of receiving it. There's little transparency regarding whether a given concession was obtained lawfully or whether the bid was low-balled in exchange for payola, political contributions, hiring relatives or even sexual favors (there's a case here in Chicago based on a restaurant concessionaire who was-- literally-- screwing the contract supervisor).

53 posted on 02/22/2006 6:42:30 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle

Rove let this one get away from him. Had many of the provisions been made public, maybe this storm would never have existed. Folks in the Administration made some terrible blunders with the PR and talking points on this deal.


54 posted on 02/22/2006 6:42:51 PM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
I don't know what to think about this whole thing !!!

All I know is it hasn't quite passed "The Smell Test" yet.

55 posted on 02/22/2006 6:42:53 PM PST by LiveFreeOrDie2001 (WAKE UP AND SMELL THE SECURITY FLAWS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I dunno. I am beginning to wonder if this is the Free Republic or DU.


56 posted on 02/22/2006 6:43:15 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle

This is the same federal government that is positively helpless in keeping illiterate Mexicans from crawling over a barbed wire fence to get into the US and is now assuring us that they can handle security at ports they have turned over to Arabs. Good grief...Homeland Security couldn't even keep track of ice trucks for Katrina Relief. They must think the US public has amnesia.


57 posted on 02/22/2006 6:43:29 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
You miss the point.

We have been asked by Bush to be uncomfortable with the wide open southern border and "trust him". After all we wouldn't want to offend the citizens of mexico...

Now we are being asked to be uncomfortable with this port deal, so we dont offend one of the only three countries that recognized the taliban...And doesn't recognize Isreal...

Bush can stuff it. Someone else can be uncomfortable this time. If Dubai doesn't like it...Tough.

58 posted on 02/22/2006 6:44:25 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle

You'll get use to it.

As soon as your figure out that not everybody here is intersted in conservatives holding power, things will make a lot more sense to you.

They're worse than liberals really, with their kneejerk nonsense.


59 posted on 02/22/2006 6:44:58 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

There are some radio hosts and bloggers who should be eating crow on this and many of them are just too stubborn.


60 posted on 02/22/2006 6:45:05 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-565 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson