Posted on 02/22/2006 12:43:46 AM PST by goldstategop
I heard Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., describe Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff's defense of turning over managing U.S. port operations to an Arab company as "tone deafness."
That would seem to be a charitable description.
I don't know what's crazier and more politically inept – the original decision to contract the management of six major U.S. ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Miami and New Orleans or the White House's continued defense of the idea in the face of overwhelming criticism.
You tell me: Is Bush tone deaf or brain dead?
"We have a very disciplined process, it's a classified process, for reviewing any acquisition by a foreign company of assets that we consider relevant to national security," explained Chertoff.
Disciplined?
Classified?
Does that make you feel any better about this "process?"
Someone needs to tell the Bush administration it's not the process that bothers clear-thinking Americans – it's the decision.
You don't need discipline to determine it's not such a good idea to turn over port security to Dubai Ports World. It's so self-evident even Democrats can see it.
It's insanity. It's political correctness gone mad. Only a suicidal nation, or one that has lost touch with reality, would take such an irresponsible step.
Need I remind the Bush administration of what it already knows? That our port security even now is less than stellar. If terrorists are determined to bring nuclear weapons into this country, and if they don't already have enough of them here to destroy American cities, entry through ports are the most likely means of entry.
Of course, they could also drive them across the unguarded border, more proof – four-and-half years after Sept. 11, 2001 – that the Bush administration is irresponsible, suicidal, insane or incompetent. Politically tone deaf doesn't begin to explain such lapses in judgment.
But you remember, of course, the Bush administration's rationale for keeping the border open? It's because we have too much work in this country that Americans just won't do. We need the cheap labor. Americans won't harvest crops. Americans won't build homes. Americans won't mow lawns. Americans won't flip hamburgers.
I guess Americans also won't run ports.
That would be the only explanation I have for why we would turn over the most sensitive security measures to a company from the United Arab Emirates.
Stunning. I'm practically speechless. Words fail this writer.
"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history," said Graham. "Most Americans are scratching their heads, wondering why this company from this region now."
Yes, Americans are scratching their heads. They're also wondering if the Republicans are still the party of national security. Historically, this has been one reason Americans had for choosing Tweedle Dum from Tweedle Dumber. But this decision has got to give Americans pause to consider if that is still the case.
When Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., can see this national security issue with clarity and a Republican administration cannot, it's time to question whether it really makes a difference. It's time to wonder if America's political leadership can really protect this country. It's time to wonder whether the federal government has abdicated all responsibility of its constitutionally mandated role of defending the homeland.
Bush has no cover on this.
Even those who would, under other circumstances, say it is "ethnic profiling" to disallow an Arab company from guarding and administering our ports are ready to ride the wave of popular opinion on this one.
And this American of Arabic ancestry is joining them.
It's quite simple.
Would we turn over border patrol operations to an Arab company to supervise?
Would we turn over airline security to an Arab country to supervise?
Then why on earth would we even consider turning over port security to an Arab country?
due to his personal contacts he has an unrealistic idea of the Arabs. Read the family history, things have changed.
Like I said before I will trust a President who has killed more islamic terrorists than any other president, rather than those who think they kill islamic terrorists from the comfort of banging keystrokes from a keyboard.
Wow! Now this is a dilema!!
A senile, self righteous peanut farmer vs a loonball....which way do I turn for answers?
So a President, according to you is supposed to base all his decisons on "style" and not on substance.
No; a President is supposed to make his decisions based on whether or not he should trust a Government-owned company from a part of the world that hates our guts.
No offense intended, but those departments don't exactly have a good record for protecting our borders.
He has allowed the Left to get to his right on this just as he has allowed Hillary to get to his right on border security.
The Rats are posturing to get to his right on spending.
Add this public relations disaster to Katrina and watch the returns in November. Perception in politics IS reality.
Wow! Now this is a dilema!!
It sure is. There's got to be a way they can both be wrong.
However, the rest of us think that these people are the soldiers of a mass movement in stealth. ERgo........a political disaster.
I confess I thought this "rop" crapola was for public consumption but apparently w really believes it (kind of like everybody coming over the border in Texas is just looking for a job)
I return once again to one of my arguments, which is "would FDR have contracted with a German firm run by Albert Speer to oversee port operations on our Atlantic coast? I mean, after all the Coast Guard and the War Department would still have been "in charge" of security, and we would not have wanted to offend the Germans, now would we?
I submit that FDR would have been facing a hostile Congress and perhaps even impeachment.
Joey Farah just killed three terrorist by typing “DIE, DIE, DIE terrorists”. Please do not underestimate the extreme power of Joey Farah :)
Just chew your cud contentedly as you're driven to the slaughterhouse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.