Posted on 02/21/2006 8:10:22 PM PST by MRMEAN
The company makes liquid fuel from coal, not Mideast oil. And its margins are huge Some 90 miles southeast of Johannesburg, the cooling towers and pipes of a giant industrial installation sprawl across five square miles. What happens at Secunda, as the place is known, is of great interest these days. At a time of sky-high oil prices, Sasol Ltd. ), Secunda's owner, churns out 160,000 barrels of gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel a day, enough to cover 28% of South Africa's needs, without using a single drop of crude oil, imported or otherwise.
Sasol is not a household name, but maybe it should be. President George W. Bush wants to curb America's dependence on Middle East oil. Analysts worry about a future gap between supplies and relentless demand. Yet Sasol, with $11.2 billion in revenues, is already enjoying huge commercial success in an arena that has eluded U.S. companies -- making fuel from coal. It is embarking on a program to brew clean-burning diesel from natural gas. It may even link up with coal producers in the U.S. heartland. "What is coming out of the U.S. makes us think there is a real business opportunity for us," says Sasol CEO Pat Davies.
No wonder investors have boosted Sasol's New York Stock Exchange-traded shares by almost 60% in a year, to 34. "You have to tip your hat to them," says Bernard J. Picchi of New York's Foresight Research Solutions LLC. "They've been doing [synfuels] longer than anyone else."
(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...
Oh man. I spent a month by that place working at a fertilizer plant on a security project. Stink, Ohhh yeah.
It was kind of cool there too, temp wise, pretty barren as well as its in the TransVaal area.
The gasification plant had rocket nets around its perimeter to make it tougher for rebels to shoot rockets at the plant.
bump.
Petro canada is PCZ not PTZ, sorry about that.
Old WW 2 Nazi technology, been made more productive, but it has been well known for many decades.
Colorado got burned on syn-fuels years ago, currently Montana is looking seriously at it, but even then it will take 5 years to bring it on line, do we have 5 years before still another war over oil breaks out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.