>>Were YOU there?
Can you repeat "evolution"?
Can you test it?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... by definition of a scientific "FACT" evolution is at most a hypothesis. I wouldn't even label it a theory since it makes no sense."
That "argument" has been stomped into dust so many times that the dust has been stomped into dust. You run it every thread and we always smack you around because it doesn't hold water. I don't know why you bother.
For a quick answer to your question, read this: http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/nov05.html
So where YOU there?
You could not have OBSERVED anything since you were NOT there so you're still in the hypothesis stage as I stated.
You can't repeat or test your hypothesis since you were NOT there. So again, at best you have a scifi version hypothesis that suits what you would LIKE TO BELIEVE and nothing more. Forget that this hypothesis of yours defies the very laws of science you worship!