Posted on 02/21/2006 7:42:06 AM PST by AntiGuv
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday that a small congregation in New Mexico may use hallucinogenic tea as part of a four-hour ritual intended to connect with God.
Justices, in their first religious freedom decision under Chief Justice John Roberts, moved decisively to keep the government out of a church's religious practice. Federal drug agents should have been barred from confiscating the hoasca tea of the Brazil-based church, Roberts wrote in the decision.
The tea, which contains an illegal drug known as DMT, is considered sacred to members of O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal, which has a blend of Christian beliefs and South American traditions. Members believe they can understand God only by drinking the tea, which is consumed twice a month at four-hour ceremonies.
New Justice Samuel Alito did not take part in the case, which was argued last fall before Justice Sandra Day O'Connor before her retirement. Alito was on the bench for the first time on Tuesday.
The legal justifications for federal protection of partial birth abortion are most definitely penumbra trails!
True. But we do not have 5 judges who respect federalism. Scalia was part of the majority in Raich, despite being in the majority in Lopez and even under Lopez you only have the slightest narrowing of commerce clause power.
Plus no Planned Parenthood lawyer is going to agrue the statue should be dismissed on federalism grounds.
So your trying to use Scripture to justify HAVING to use a drug in order to know the Lord?
I haven't read anything either. However, where a government law has a reasonable basis not related to religion, such as recreational drug restrictions, I don't think such should cicumscribed by putting a religious label on the activity. That just opens a pandora's box about pedigree, motivation, etc, about the religious practice, ala the separation of church and state issue. Plus, the courts would have to get into the business of parsing just how dangerous the drug it, medically and on behavior.
I have done no such thing. One need not justify themselves to any other for the use of an herb. I have quoted Romans 14:2-3 but 4 answers you.
Romans 14:2-4
For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.
Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.
All those standing in judgement are in disobedience to God.
Those willing to use violence to oppress others and imprison
them for the possession, protection or propagation of a gift
from God are adverse to the will of God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.