Santorum's mortgage raises interest

SEN. RICK SANTORUM and his wife received a $500,000, five-year mortgage for their Leesburg, Va., home from a small, private Philadelphia bank run by a major campaign donor - even though its stated policy is to make loans only to its "affluent" investors, which the senator is not.

Good-government experts said the mortgage from The Philadelphia Trust Co. raises serious questions about Santorum's conduct at a time when he is the Senate GOP's point man on ethics reform. They said it would be a violation of the Senate's ethics rules if Santorum received something a regular citizen could not get.

A campaign spokeswoman for Santorum, who is seeking re-election, said the couple's mortgage interest rate was "market-driven," but she refused to offer specifics, as did officials from Philadelphia Trust.

• A political-action committee chaired by Santorum, America's Foundation, spends less money on direct aid to GOP candidates - its stated purpose - and more on expenditures than similar PACs. And its expenditure reports are littered with scores of unorthodox expenses for a political committee, with charges at coffee and ice cream shops and fast-food joints as well as supermarkets and a home-hardware store.

For example, America's Foundation made 66 charges at Starbucks Coffee, almost all in the senator's hometown of Leesburg, Va., and 94 charges at another D.C.-area vendor, HMSHost Corp. Virginia Davis, the campaign spokeswoman, defended all the charges as campaign-related, saying the senator prefers to meet political aides in coffee shops rather than on Senate property.

• A little-publicized charity founded by Santorum in 2001, the Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, is not registered in Pennsylvania, even though the majority of its fundraising and spending takes place here.

What's more, three years of public tax returns show the charity spent just 35.9 percent of the nearly $1 million it raised during that time on charity grants, well below the 75 percent threshold recommended by experts. The group's Web site says it has distributed a total of $474,000 to groups, many faith-based, that fight social ills and urban poverty.

It appears that Santorum's unconventional mortgage deal could pose the biggest problem for the senator, who consistently has trailed his likely November rival, Democratic state treasurer Bob Casey Jr., by double digits in the polls. Unlike longtime Washington pol Santorum, Casey does not maintain a so-called "leadership PAC."

Melanie Sloan, a former federal prosecutor who heads Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, said that "anytime he gets something that a regular person couldn't get, that's an improper gift" - regardless of any fees or the interest rate.

Officials with Philadelphia Trust have been generous supporters of Santorum's campaign since the private bank opened its doors in late 1998. Federal records show the company's executives, directors and their spouses have donated $24,000 either to the senator's campaign or to the America's Foundation PAC. Of that total, $13,000 came from the man who signed the mortgage papers - Philadelphia Trust CEO Michael Crofton - and his wife.

Crofton also has been chairman of the board of advisers for Operation Good Neighbor, and records show the bank has donated at least $10,000 to the senator's charity.

Philadelphia Trust advertises itself as an independent private bank for "affluent investors" - who have liquid assets of at least $250,000 - and for institutions. On its Web site, it states that its "[b]anking services are available only to investment advisory clients whose portfolios we manage, oversee or administer."

A call to the bank confirmed that its mortgages are only for investors and not for the general public.

According to a review of the annual financial-disclosure forms that Santorum files, he has never held an investment portfolio with Philadelphia Trust. And in 2002, the year he obtained the mortgage, the value range he gave for his small number of investments could not have exceeded $140,000.

The Pennsylvania senator bought the Virginia home, 43 miles from Capitol Hill, a year earlier for $643,361, and - according to Loudoun County property records - had received a $405,000 mortgage from a traditional lender. The 2002 refinancing with Philadelphia Trust exceeded the initial loan by $95,000.

The chairman of Philadelphia Trust - George Marlin, a one-time Conservative Party candidate for mayor of New York - said discussing any customer's transaction would violate bank privacy laws. Crofton did not return phone calls.

A bank director, Karen Iacovelli, also would not answer questions in detail, but when pressed on whether the bank does loan business with non-investment customers, she said, "Yes and no - it's a judgment call."

There is no evidence that Santorum - who sits on the Senate Banking Committee - took any official actions on behalf of Philadelphia Trust. The senator's campaign said no special treatment was involved.

"Sen. Santorum and his wife, who is an attorney and a nurse, applied for the mortgage using the standard application process that Americans must go through when applying for a mortgage and received a market-driven rate for their second home in the Washington, D.C., area to house them and their six children when the Senate is in session," said Davis, the campaign spokeswoman. She would not answer follow-up questions.

This is not the first time that Santorum's Virginia residency has posed political problems. In late 2004, the senator came under fire when it was revealed that the school district in Penn Hills, Pa., had paid roughly $67,000 to cyberschool the Santorums' six kids, even though the children are residing in the Leesburg home full-time. Santorum owns a much smaller home in Penn Hills and keeps his voting residence there; the home has most recently been occupied by Karen Santorum's niece.

Santorum also made a surprising admission to The New York Times Magazine last year, telling the magazine that "[w]e live paycheck to paycheck, absolutely." He said that his parents - retired Veterans Administration employees - send him money every now and then.

The senator - as well as his political aides - are able to travel the country for fundraisers and other events by billing the cost to America's Foundation, a "leadership PAC."

Federal election regulators have allowed members of Congress to establish these political-action committees to support other candidates and political-party activities, as long as the committee doesn't directly aid the campaign of the politician who created it.

But Santorum's leadership PAC is noteworthy in several ways. America's Foundation has spent just 18.1 percent of the whopping $5,363,735 it has raised since the start of 2001 on direct aid to state and local candidates, less than all five other leadership PACs that were compared, and considerably less than several of them.

The other leadership PACs examined belonged to Senate GOP leaders Bill Frist of Tennessee and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Democratic leaders Harry Reid of Nevada and Dick Durban of Illinois, and House GOP leader Roy Blunt of Missouri.

It's routine for a PAC like Santorum's to pay operating expenses, such as staffers and fundraising, renting halls for events, related travel, and sometimes for rent and maintaining an office. But the probe found Santorum's federal records on PAC spending also contain scores of credit-card charges that experts found highly unconventional.

In addition to the 160 charges at the two coffee vendors, Starbucks and HMSHost, America's Foundation charged numerous meals at fast-food restaurants - eight at Arby's and four at Burger King, for example - as well as pizza and Chinese restaurants in northern Virginia.

The PAC also reported spending on a slew of American retailers. The list includes conventional office-supply stores but also some that are unusual for campaigns, including charges at Overstock.com, Wal-Mart, Kmart, Target, Circuit City, Barnes & Noble - even a $273.48 charge at a Restoration Hardware in Ardmore listed as "repairs."Five charges were made at Giant Food markets in Leesburg and another Virginia location.

The review of other leadership PACs showed that such charges are unusual, and one good-government expert - CREW's Sloan - said some of them carry at least the appearance of being for personal use, which would violate Senate ethics rules.

"Let them explain why an ice cream cone at Ben & Jerry's is a campaign expense," Sloan said, referring to a $4.48 charge logged in August 2002.

Campaign spokeswoman Davis insisted that every charge was campaign-related, citing "routine expenses such as office supplies including furniture, travel for staff, meals, and grocery items for various functions such as fundraisers and planning meetings."

Davis would not directly respond to a follow-up request for information about the Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, a charity founded by Santorum in 2001.

A look at the charity's tax returns for 2001, 2002, and 2003 found that of the nearly $1 million received in donations, 56.5 percent went toward expenses including salaries, travel and conferences, and only 35.9 percent went to charitable grants. Experts said charities should aim to spend a mininum of 75 percent, if not more, on program grants.

What's more, Pennsylvania Department of State officials said Operation Good Neighbor would be required to register with them if it solicited more than $25,000 here, and records on donors from 2002 show that it raised at least $94,000 from Pennsylvania sources.

But officials said they could not find a record of any registration. Under law, the state could impose civil penalties, although more typically the agency sends "cease and desist" letters that prevent additional fundraising.

The charity's 2002 donor list included the $10,000 from Philadelphia Trust Co., as well as $10,000 from the Keystone Sanitary Landfill, owned by Scranton businessman Louis DeNaples; and $5,000 from the Delaware River Port Authority.

Gary Ruskin of the Congressional Accountability Project, a good-government group, questioned ties between the charity and Santorum's campaign structure, including $50,000 in salary to its executive director, Rob Bickhart, who is also the senator's campaign-finance manager, a former staffer for Santorum and Sen. Arlen Specter, and a former public-affairs official with SEPTA.

"It looks like another pocket to fill," said Ruskin, adding that "Sen. Santorum is obviously a man with many pockets."

This article stems from an investigative piece that Daily News staff writer Will Bunch wrote on a freelance assignment for American Prospect, a national political magazine with a liberal bent. The entire 6,000-word story is slated to be available today at the magazine’s Web site, Prospect.org, and the magazine will be on newsstands later this month. You can also discuss the piece at Bunch’s blog, Attytood.com.

What pisses me off is that they bought ice cream from BEN & JERRY'S, I could care less about spending money on ice cream, but why buy it from commies?!

They ain't commies any more -- they sold out to Unilever. Ben and Jerry's is made by The Man.

"There's a good reason why he and his family are in the DC area instead of in Penn Hills---he was elected by the people of Pennsylvania to represent them in the U.S. Senate, and the U.S. Senate meets in Washington, DC. Senator Santorum owns a home in Penn Hills and pays property taxes on it. It is his tax money that is used to finance the cyberschool. If he chose not to have his family with him while working 7 days a week in DC, then he could have kept his kids in the Penn Hills public schools, but as it is they are enrolled in the Penn Hills cyberschool that allows them to take classes even when they aren't in Penn Hills. If a property owner in Penn Hills can't enroll his children in the local cyberschool, who can?"

He's abusing his position.

Could YOU do that from another state at taxpayer expense?

Of course not!

SANTORUM is notorious for abusing the power of his position. He has the LOCAL pa school district PAY for his kids to have long distance schooling. He claims residence in Pa so he can represent who voted for him but lives in VA..

This has been hashed and rehashed numerous times, there is really no excuse for being ignorant about it.

The only "position" Santorum is "abusing" to get the local district to pay for his children's education is the "position" of local taxpayer. Any PA resident can enroll their children in cyberschool, and the local district pays for the tuition.

In any event, he ceased this because it is too difficult to explain to people who like to throw around smears.

No, on a FIVE YEAR mortgage it's just over $9,200 which seems like a huge stretch on a senator's salary, although I have no idea if his wife has an income.

Could YOU do that from another state at taxpayer expense?

And why wouldn't you be able to? Cyberschools are cutting edge by that's the idea behind them.

Hi nmh, I am a practicing Catholic who lives in Pennsylvania. I was heartbroken by Santorum's support of Specter in the primary. I felt it was a betrayal and it opened my eyes to the fact that Rick, is, afterall, just another politician.

However, you are being too tough on him. He's got a friend in the mortgage biz who gave him a mortgage. Big deal. He pays property taxes on a house in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania offers its residents cyber homeschooling as an option. I don't see any reason why he can't choose that option. I am sorry he stopped doing it. I don't think it's indicative of anything and it's certainly not an abuse of power. The man pays PA property taxes. He's got a right to have his children schooled in that manner.

E-Loan currently has an offer-
30 year amortization, 10 year balloon payment-

Right @ 3000 a month.

I would bet in 2002, Santorum got a better % rate, probably with a 5 year balloon payment.
Don't know about VA escrow but would bet he's paying less than $3,000 a month. Easy on household income of above $200,000.

This is a big, wet kiss for Casey from the homo's in the Philly media. Last week, Casey stood up proudly in defense of extra rights for homos.

The story is a joke, however. It's muckraking in the worst sense of the word--a desperate attempt to make legal transactions look suspect, and to insinuate illegal ones.

But nothing is beyond the Philadelphia media. Lies against anyone but the most unreformed leftists are their stock-and-trade.

The BEEF is Right Here ! This does NOT LOOK GOOD!

This is a mega-yawn if you ask me.

I'm still waiting for the media to give Casey's finances a "rectal" like they did with Santorum's. I reckon I'll be waiting a long time.

It doesn't say that it's a standard mortgage with a five year balloon. If that's the case, then why go to this bank, he should have been able to swing that loan with a bank that he has no other involvement with. However, with a private bank like this, it is not unusual for them to make loans that on the surface seem "risky."

"Could YOU do that from another state at taxpayer expense?"

If I was paying property taxes (you know, from where school districts in PA get their funding) in Penn Hills, you can bet your behind that I'd be able to enroll my kids in a cyberschool even if we were temporarily living in Mongolia. In fact, if I had been the one whose children were enrolled in the cybershool, they'd still be enrolled, since you wouldn't have liberal politicians carrying out a political witchhunt againt me like they do against Senator Santorum. Rick Santorum had every right to enroll his children in the school district into which he is paying property taxes, and the only reason why he pulled his kids out of the school is because the media was using the "issue" to attack him. I'm surprised a self-described conservative such as yourself would fall for this media scam hook, line and sinker.

I agree, if it is a 30 year amortization with a 5 year balloon, it's not a problem, but why not just get this from a normal mortgage company. If in fact it's a 5 year mortgage, I don't see how he can swing it. The payments would be over $110K a year and that would be tough on his salary, especially when you consider that there wouldn't be that much interest to deduct.

Then Rick will have NOOOO problems fully disclosing the loan documents and complete terms -- including the interest rate -- and a record of the payments against the amortization schedule for the loan.

And as a fellow conservative, I'd urge him to DO SO QUICKLY!

Historically, it's not the deal that screws these guys, IT'S THE COVER-UP!!!!!

Of course, if he loses in November...then who knows...

Actually, when a senator loses an election, they usually get a private sector job that pays about five times what their senate salary was.

Why go to this bank? I don't know, ease, friends, you know the loan officer and want him/her to get the commission.

Anyway, I wonder, he gets the loan in 2002 with re-election bid in 2006. He loses, sells the house and makes $500,000 (assuming 643,000 house in 2001 is now worth over a million.) If he wins, re-finance again to make balloon payment. I know I'm making assumptions here but it makes sense. (To me.) :-)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.