Skip to comments.
Anesthesiologists Delay Calif. Execution
AP/YAHOO ^
| 2/21/06
| LISA LEFF
Posted on 02/21/2006 6:34:34 AM PST by Vaquero
Anesthesiologists Delay Calif. Execution
By LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
SAN QUENTIN, Calif. - The planned execution of a man convicted of raping and murdering a 17-year-old girl was delayed until Tuesday night after two anesthesiologists refused to participate because of ethical concerns. ADVERTISEMENT
With the execution scheduled for 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, defense lawyers requested a stay from the federal judge who last week ordered San Quentin State Prison to have an anesthesiologist on hand to minimize Michael Angelo Morales' pain as he was put to death by lethal injection. A second anesthesiologist was retained as a backup.
Although U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel denied the motion, both anesthesiologists withdrew, citing ethical concerns raised by his ruling.
The exact wording of the judge's order was not immediately available, but the anesthesiologists issued a statement through the prison saying they were concerned about a requirement that they intervene in the event that Morales woke up or appeared to be in pain.
"Any such intervention would clearly be medically unethical," said the doctors, who have not been identified. "As a result, we have withdrawn from participation in this current process."
The American Medical Association, the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the California Medical Association all opposed the anesthesiologists' participation as unethical and unprofessio
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: deathrow; michaelmorales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Lets get the word out to all right minded CA Anesthesiologists, to get down there to San Quentin to get this important job done.
1
posted on
02/21/2006 6:34:35 AM PST
by
Vaquero
To: Vaquero
2
posted on
02/21/2006 6:37:18 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: Vaquero
3
posted on
02/21/2006 6:37:28 AM PST
by
digger48
To: Vaquero
Paging Dr. Howard, Dr Fine, Dr Howard.
4
posted on
02/21/2006 6:39:19 AM PST
by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: Vaquero
Let's just withold food and water. Judge Fogel should have no constitutional problem with it. His judicial soulmate Judge Greer already gave it a thumbs-up last year.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
5
posted on
02/21/2006 6:40:16 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: trashcanbred
I'd prefer Dr. Lechter at this point...
6
posted on
02/21/2006 6:40:28 AM PST
by
ECM
To: Vaquero
The planned execution of a man convicted of raping and murdering a 17-year-old girl was delayed until Tuesday night after two anesthesiologists refused to participate because of ethical concerns. WTH?
7
posted on
02/21/2006 6:41:15 AM PST
by
SIDENET
("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
To: Vaquero
I am not sure I understand their objections. It would be unethical to stop the man's pain just before he died?
8
posted on
02/21/2006 6:41:37 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: Mamzelle
exactly...a bullet to the head or a neck tie party would be my solution. We must be kindler, gentler, compassionate, executioners now, when the vermin under the death warrant were cold blooded killers.
Try to figure it out and it will make you nuts.
9
posted on
02/21/2006 6:42:02 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
To: Vaquero
"Any such intervention would clearly be medically unethical," said the doctors, who have not been identified. "As a result, we have withdrawn from participation in this current process." Of course, intervention in the birth process whereby a pair of scissors is stuck into the baby's skull (without benefit of an anesthesiologist to protect the baby from pain) and the baby's brain is sucked out so the skull can be crushed in order to make it easier to then deliver the dead baby for the convenience of the mother who decides late in the pregancy that she no longer wants the baby -- that is not an ethical concern at all.
10
posted on
02/21/2006 6:42:49 AM PST
by
VRWCmember
(You are STILL safer hunting with Dick Cheney than riding in a car with Ted Kennedy!)
To: Vaquero
I can go to the dentist who will sedate me so that I don't feel a thing while he worls on my teeth. This man strangles a girl with his belt, when the belt breaks he smashes her skull with a hemmer, drags her from the car and rapes her. And the judge is concerned that this piece of work may feel a touch of pain.
The murderer is given a sedative prior to the lethal drugs being introduced. This has been well documented.
Mr Judge, you should be ashamed of yourself. What kind of justice are you providing the victim and her family?
11
posted on
02/21/2006 6:44:33 AM PST
by
sofaman
("Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." Mark Twain.)
To: SIDENET
Its comes down to our need to show compassion to a child killer. If it was to me, I'd volunteer to strangle him with my bare hands and go soundly to sleep tonight. And I'd have no ethical problem with delivering justice that way. Its more humane than the needle.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
12
posted on
02/21/2006 6:45:23 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: trashcanbred
Paging Dr. Howard, Dr Fine, Dr Howard.
13
posted on
02/21/2006 6:45:31 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
To: sofaman
let's try again....
worls = works
and a hemmer = hammer
it's early...leave me alone.
14
posted on
02/21/2006 6:46:39 AM PST
by
sofaman
("Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." Mark Twain.)
To: goldstategop
Have you taken a professional oath never to do such a thing? I think this is a better job for a lawyer.
15
posted on
02/21/2006 6:46:56 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: SIDENET
But, let a pharmacist refuse to fill a script for RU-486, and all hell breaks loose.
16
posted on
02/21/2006 6:47:06 AM PST
by
Arm_Bears
(You are the New Day.)
To: Vaquero
The Death Penalty isn't for making examples it's for making bad people DEAD!
17
posted on
02/21/2006 6:47:07 AM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(The Death Penalty isn't for making examples it's for making bad people DEAD!)
To: Vaquero
Hey, move him to Oregon, assisted suicide is all the rage here!
To: Vaquero
19
posted on
02/21/2006 6:47:24 AM PST
by
claudiustg
(Delenda est Iran!)
To: Mamzelle
I'm not a doctor. Just a concerned average citizen who's had it with liberal judges coddling murderers.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
20
posted on
02/21/2006 6:49:28 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson