Replies

To: Brilliant

I have to admit, the doctors have a good case. First do no harm would seem to preclude making a buck off of executions.

5 posted on 02/21/2006 5:36:03 AM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)

To: Melas

"I have to admit, the doctors have a good case. First do no harm would seem to preclude making a buck off of executions."

This is exactly why this method of execution should never have been chosen. It was destined to be problematic from the get-go.

47 posted on 02/21/2006 6:01:15 AM PST by davisfh

To: Melas

Looking at it that way, you are right. We should go back to a nice, clean gallows that anyone can run. Or fire up "Old Sparky!"

51 posted on 02/21/2006 6:03:19 AM PST by 50sDad (Racist: Anyone who is winning an argument with a Liberal.)

To: Melas

The anesthesiologists have no case. They participate in prison abortions.

104 posted on 02/21/2006 2:14:14 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794