Posted on 02/20/2006 7:57:31 PM PST by Coleus
Nothing wrong with doubting Darwinism, but prepare to get slammed and good!
They should be very careful in Pennsylvania, Judge Jones may jail them for this heresy.
Hilarious!
No its not!
Yes it is!
Not!
Is!
Nyeah!
Jerk!
Azzhat!
F##khead!
Weenie!
Just getting in a little warmup....:)
The Church of Darwinism gets really bent out of shape when proclaimations get nailed to their door.
Oh c'mon! The next thing you're going to tell me is that some scientists doubt global warming! *sarcasm*
Creationist/Evolution double-ping.
http://www.blackmask.com/Detailed/Liberal_Arts/Charles_Darwin/The_Origin_of_Species_by_means_of_Natural_Selection_752.html
Above URL is free book in several formats.
I will bet a lot of people argue about the book that have never read it.
For true science to exist, there must be challenges to it. The greatest challenge for Darwinism is the evolution from organic matter to cells. This has yet to be done in the labitory.
It's more like "100 against Einstein", don't you think ?
a lot of people who argue about it may not of read the bible either.
http://www.biblegateway.com/
a lot of people who argue about it may not of read the bible either.
http://www.biblegateway.com/
It's easier to mischaracterize a book that you haven't read.
And how many Paleontologists? Zero, I suspect.
And I bet geologists are almost totally absent from the list.
Assuming that this is even true, 154 biologists, out of thousands who support evolution, is at best less than 10%. Probably closer to say 5% of biologists don't believe in evolution. Not exactly a solid talking point for the ID folks.
That is very intriguing, but my guess is that over 500,000 would proclaim their doubts about the alternatives, if you started a list.
Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools.
How many of the Discovery Institute's signatories are named "Steve"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.