Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Engineers Week: Feb 19-25
EWEEK ^ | Feb. 19, 2005 | various

Posted on 02/20/2006 8:24:23 AM PST by avg_freeper

Main Site: with activities for kids

Lockheed Martin Inspires Central Florida Students to Pursue Technical Careers During National Engineers Week 2006

ORLANDO, Fla., Feb. 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Lockheed Martin's Central Florida businesses will support local activities to promote math and science education for students during National Engineers Week, February 19-25. Through fun hands-on activities, students will learn about engineering and engineering careers.

excerpt...

General Dynamics Hosts Student Events for National Engineers Week
ARLINGTON, Va., Feb. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics (NYSE: GD - News), is sponsoring events nationwide during National Engineers Week beginning Feb. 20, 2006.

excerpt...



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: campus; engineering; nsf; scienceeducation; sciencefair; teens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: 1rudeboy
The operative term is "starting," not "top end."

Actually, that is the top end, or close to it. We were talking about an Engineering Ph.D. with 10+ years of experience and a good track record.

Compare/contrast with an MBA as middle management, $130k, or senior management, $150k. Executive, over $200k.

81 posted on 02/20/2006 11:43:45 AM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

I need to see the hard numbers. If you have a link, or if it was posted above and I missed it, please direct me.


82 posted on 02/20/2006 11:48:18 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

woot


83 posted on 02/20/2006 11:48:53 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I visit plants everyday with lots of engineers working hard at all sorts of tasks to get the work done.

The american IT engineers might be in trouble, but they are like railroad designers...... their day might be over.progress

There always will be work for engineers.


84 posted on 02/20/2006 11:54:01 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I need to see the hard numbers.

Then do some research. My numbers come from personal experience.

85 posted on 02/20/2006 12:02:39 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
There always will be work for engineers.

Care to chime in on this one?

86 posted on 02/20/2006 12:10:32 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

There's your problem, then.


87 posted on 02/20/2006 12:22:21 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

Have you considered defense industry work? If you can get into an R&D group, the technology will likely be cutting edge and all the burdensome DOD program requirements are reduced or eliminated. Also, there are lots of folks in their 40s/50s/60s still working as individual contributors here (Northrop Grumman).


88 posted on 02/20/2006 12:26:45 PM PST by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
There's your problem, then.

Not sure what you mean by this. Those are the numbers out of the most recent salary surveys I've seen. Not online, as we had to p-a-y for those surveys.

89 posted on 02/20/2006 12:30:48 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

You have made it impossible to disprove your claim. That is a problem.


90 posted on 02/20/2006 12:32:40 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You have made it impossible to disprove your claim.

Did you try to do some salary survey research online? No? We're talking simple burden-of-proof here. Do you have any reasonably credible information which contradicts? I've given my numbers, had at least some of them verified independently by a recruiter in this thread. Now, exactly which number/numbers are you calling into question?

91 posted on 02/20/2006 12:46:47 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: jrp
Have you considered defense industry work?

Have applied for positions at Lockheed, Raytheon, LLNL. Except for the latter, I've never seen research positions open up.

92 posted on 02/20/2006 12:48:33 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

I have been with my particular agency for 25 years and we have yet to lay people off. We have had cutbacks but we solved those with voluntary buyouts and normal attrition. During the Clinton administration we hired almost no one (he didn't like us) and now we are paying catchup in a huge way.


93 posted on 02/20/2006 1:10:40 PM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

Every single one, for starters. Genius.


94 posted on 02/20/2006 1:31:50 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Every single one, for starters.

Then I'm sure that you'll be happy to meet your burden of proof.

95 posted on 02/20/2006 1:48:24 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: HolgerDansk

Don't dare to speak of burdens of proof, when all you have offered to this point is anecdotal evidence. I am under no obligation to hold myself to a higher standard.


96 posted on 02/20/2006 1:51:05 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; avg_freeper
Insert obligatory observation that engineers can't find jobs below.

YIKES!

At first glance, I thought you said engineers can't find b-low jobs.....

97 posted on 02/20/2006 2:04:36 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Not for free.


98 posted on 02/20/2006 2:06:15 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Don't dare to speak of burdens of proof, when all you have offered to this point is anecdotal evidence. am under no obligation to hold myself to a higher standard.

But logic demands that, in the absence of contradictary evidence, that which is available prevails. To say otherwise is purely prejudicial.

You've already lost the argument, but I enjoy sandbagging as much as the next guy. The EE Times 2004 Survey found the average salary for a Ph.D. in engineering to be $119,000; however this includes those in "engineering managment", which is a different career path. Note the salaries for VP of Engineering ($131,000) are in line with what previously posted for senior management. Some of the figures in the survey, however, include cost of benefits in compensation, which tends to inflate them.

The biggest hit in income for Engineers in recent years has been the decline in incentive compensation: stock options and bonuses have both gone the way of Sarbanes-Oxley.

To save your poor tired fingers the effort, here's the relevant hyperlink:

EE Times 2004 Salary and Job Survey

Thus your implication that asking for $120k is "too much" would appear to mistaken.

99 posted on 02/20/2006 2:19:10 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Oh, ok then.


100 posted on 02/20/2006 2:19:34 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson