Posted on 02/20/2006 7:46:11 AM PST by Dark Skies
When President Bush gave his "axis of evil" speech he went out of his way to make the world understand that it isn't a war with Islam itself that we were joining — and I say joining because the war had been started by the Jihadists decades before. And, in observance to our Western principles, that must be the correct way to view our conflagration with radical Islam.
Let's face facts, it certainly is uncomfortable to a Westerner who has been brought up on tolerance, freedom of religion, and liberty to contemplate a war against an entire religion. But are we approaching a time when Western nations won't have a choice but to target Islam itself in certain ways to keep their own people safe. The best course of action is to make public displays of Islam and certain of its practices illegal in Western nations.
So, the question becomes are we at that time now? Are we fast approaching a time when Mosques will be closed and banned? Have we come to a time when Islamic literature is turned away from our borders? Have the childish and dangerous reactions of Muslims to this cartoon in a Danish newspaper proven that Islam cannot be trusted to be a vital, peaceful, and law-abiding segment of society?
It is looking like yes is the answer to these queries.
We are already approaching this today. In Ontario they have officially outlawed Muslim Sharia law, that law that uses religious precepts to enforce moral and society codes of conduct. And Muslim "family councils" have been stopped where local community groups may supplement Canadian law with their local custom.
Several members of the John Howard administration in Australia have spoken out against Islamic clashes with Western notions of law and societal comportment many times over the last few years.
Recently Howard himself said, "I do think there is this particular complication because there is a fragment which is utterly antagonistic to our kind of society, and that is a difficulty ... You can't find any equivalent in Italian, or Greek, or Lebanese, or Chinese or Baltic immigration to Australia. There is no equivalent of raving on about jihad, but that is the major problem."
Muslims routinely destroy property, threaten death and bodily harm to those who speak out against them, and they constantly fund terrorism throughout the world. In Syria they have burnt an embassy, in Europe Muslims have been responsible for murdering people who have written out against Islam or made movies, and other forms of art. These actions are also approved by Islamic teachers (Imams) and religious leaders, not just undertaken by warped loners claiming to represent Islam quite against the will of the majority or authority.
With this ridiculous cartoon issue, we have seen that Islam has no sense of perspective. In the west parody or satire is seen as not only common, but completely harmless for the most part. And religion is not immune to parody and satire, though even in the west most people are often uncomfortable with religious satire. Usually only people filled with hate attack religion in parody and most in the West instinctively know this. As a result, most people dismiss such parody as foolishness and bad taste.
But with Muslims overreacting — in western eyes at least — to this silly cartoon issue in the way they have, it becomes nearly impossible for Westerners to view Islam as a peaceful religion, but more as a vicious hate group itself. And that perception is justified with the actions that Muslims have increasingly perpetrated over the ensuing years. So, we find that Islam presents a danger to the safety of the populace all too often. It is violent, oppressive, and reactionary.
But, what is to be done about it? We have been raised to feel that religion should be left untouched by government. Freedom of religion is at the very core of our beliefs. And this concept is an important one to uphold. So, how can we honestly and without hypocrisy begin to look toward making Islam illegal?
There is a parallel of sorts in the USA that might be used as a template for action. The Ku klux Klan.
After the Civil War ended, the KKK arose from the ashes of war as an advocacy group for the disenfranchised white voter in the south. But it quickly became a terrorist organization bent on taking out revenge on the south's newly freed black population for having lost the war. It got so bad that even one of the original organizers, C.S. Cavalry General Nathan Bedford Forrest, denounced the organization and quit it in disgust.
But as the late 1800s rolled on and the south began to re-enter the Union as full partners in government, the KKK began to lose steam and prominence. For a time it subsided. But as the 20th century neared, it re-emerged and this time became a nationwide and powerful force taking on the flavor of religious, civic and racial duty. The KKK became invested in government and claimed millions of members nation wide.
In the 1920s, however, it became too much for a liberty loving country to allow the KKK to any longer exist. In Indiana, the entire state government was scandalized by their fealty to Indiana's Klan leader who had raped and beaten his secretary on a train trip. Violence against and frequent lynching of southern blacks became so pervasive that Congress finally acted and banned the Klan. The organization collapsed never again to reclaim the power and prominence it once had.
Now, the KKK has always based its precepts on Christianity, as well as racial identity. It also reacted with violence, rallies, death threats and killing when it was threatened. It careened far away from being a mere "idea" or religious theology and became a terrorist organization. And it became a terrorist organization even though literally millions of Americans that belonged to or identified with the Klan were not themselves violent, evil, or dangerous citizens.
The leadership of the Klan supported violence. The leadership preached violence. The leadership planned and fomented it. Therefore, it had to go because it became a danger to every law-abiding citizen, whether they agreed with the racial and religious concepts the Klan espoused or not.
Islam has become the KKK of the 21st century. The sooner we awake to this truth and take steps to ban the religion, or somehow curtail its pernicious influence the better. The west is going to have to put sever restrictions on Islamic Mosques and public display of Islam. Further, devout Muslims should not be allowed to hold public office (though it certainly should not become a racial issue — sins of the father should not be visited upon the sons).
This is no religious purge as in centuries past. In the past religions were banned to be replaced by the state sponsored sect and believers of the banned religion were mistreated, tortured, unduly taxed, and terrorized. This is absolutely not the model the west would follow by banning aspects of Islam today. No religion is replacing Islam and no one is suggesting that Muslims be mistreated. But the creed to which they hold is fast becoming the most dangerous one in the world today. It is a fine line that we walk to consider banning Islam, but the safety of society is at risk not to do so.
This is not an easy conclusion at which to arrive. But if we continue to turn a blind eye to the danger that Islam presents to the west, we are signing our own death warrants.
The KKK was put down in the USA and made powerless for the same reason. Communism was destroyed for the same reason, as well. Islam is a danger to the world.
Unfortunately, it is just that simple.
Janet Reno (only known antidote for Viagra) must not have gotten the message.
If we constantly let the left, MSM, demon-rats define the debate by saying this terrorist group is a religion then we are spinning our wheels. Remove the incorrectly applied term of religion to this band of world terrorists and the 1st Amendment does not get in the way.
"Their silence tells us they approve of koran (comic book for retards) motivated killing against any non-mudslime."
It's just not so. Their silence could be just media ignoring them, it could be because they have an honest fear of reprisal, or it could simply be apathy. Muslims condemning violence just isn't good copy for today's bloodthirsty media.
Unfortunately hard to see where/who the good guys are. If you're not out on the street protesting beheading in your religeon's name, you're not the good guy. You're a silent supporter.
Perhaps. But try we must < /Yoda>
So you're trusting everything you've seen on the MSM to tell you the facts about 'over there'?
One minute the MSM is the bad guys, the next, they've always told you and shown you the truth.
No, I'm not saying the bad things didn't happen. But we've all be exposed to other's agendas.
Personally, every last one of the Muslims "I" know are pretty ordinary. Some jerks, some nice, some just tryin' to get by.
That's it.
Can it be really called a religion?
Mohamed created Islam as a tool to aquire power.
Islam is still being used as a form of power governance and does not accept seperation of State and Mosque. In fact it DEMANDS (or else) the Mosque IS the state.
Will you marry me?
(I sure hope yer a gal!)
Again, what do you do for those 'good' guys who truly believe they have a religion who are on our side?
Do we just count them as collateral damage and kick them to the curb when we declare their religion as invalid?
"How would we outlaw a religion?"
We don't have to outlaw it, just take away their tax exempt status. That way they couldn't profit from plotting aganst us.
Very good. I'll pass that along to the owner of the local Holiday gas station and store. He's a Muslim, and will get a laugh out of it.
Guess what's on the wall behind the cash register? A poster showing Osama Bin Laden with a target superimposed over his face.
I don't think he wants Fallujah here.
Treason charges? Naw...just one big bad Mosque right here in Cleveland...see my profile and links there in.
And the investigations are on-going...
If we can ban the KKK"
Problem is, we can't, and we haven't.
No Problem,,Just Cross Burnings have been banned..Fire Hazard.You can't ban ideals,just objects..
I agree with you about the silence of the moderate Muslims, it is indeed deafening. And I'm sure that there is an element that does indeed at least tacitly agree with the crazies through their silence.
But I also think that moderating Islam is the best course of action if it can be done. By moderating, I mean instilling fact that in a modern society a religion must subject to common law. Hunting down and killing the Islamist crazies is the other part of that strategy.
Pardon me if I don't take your word for this. How about showing us pictures of thousands of your mudslime friends protesting the "few" radical mudslimes? "Think Music" written by "Jeopardy" creator Merv Griffin playing.
By the way, I don't doubt they are thankful for the common law in the US. They are using it to strangle us.
An absolutely horrible precedent which will come back to bite those that made it happen.
There you go. A case where people are being prosecuted for breaking the laws of this nation. Our system at work. Thanks for the details on your freeppage.
"No. I'm talking about enforcing sedition laws against INDIVIDUALS, not religions. Got it?"
I was talking about how to enforce the article's proposed outlawing of the entire damn religion of Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.