Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl; John Jorsett
I'd be interested in the details of their argument. It's a little different than this discussion from the Legislative Analysts Office evaluation of the 2003-04 Budget Bill, but seems related. I can't figure out what how an increase could effect the original settlement with the tobacco industry:

Well, whether it effects the MSA or not, it DOES impact smokers............again!  California smokers are paying the Tobacco Settlement Money 110%.  NOT Big Tobacco and NOT the state of California.  But the smokers!

I think it's time the state go after someone else for a change.

48 posted on 02/20/2006 2:14:11 PM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: SheLion
I think it's time the state go after someone else for a change.

I think it's time the state quit their nanny-state socialism, cut government and quit spending!
But I agree, going after smokers (again) makes no sense.

49 posted on 02/20/2006 2:20:35 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson