Skip to comments.
The Shot Heard Round the World (Newsweeks new hit piece)
Newsweek ^
| Feb. 27, 2006
| Isikoff & Clift. Haha
Posted on 02/19/2006 7:06:18 AM PST by roostercogburn
The Shot Heard Round the World. He peppered a man in the face, but didn't tell his boss. Inside Dick Cheney's dark, secretive mind-setand the forces that made it that way.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; isikoff; newsweak; newsweek; propagandists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
This is crap. Boggles my mind how they think they will increase their magazines readership by publishing opinion pieces like this as real news. I really want to find the piece they have listed on the cover. "What hunters say". Dark secretive mind.
To: roostercogburn
Why didn't they write a story to explore the dark, perverted mind of Bill Clinton?
To: roostercogburn
Inside Dick Cheney's dark, secretive mind-setand the forces that made it that way.The shooting was just Dick's first shot at tort reform.
;-)
3
posted on
02/19/2006 7:09:42 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Alan Simpson: all you get is "controversy, crap and confusion" from the media)
To: roostercogburn
Let them overplay this. To any dispassionate observer they come out looking like the fools they are.
To: roostercogburn
But Hilary Clinton and other top democrats echoed this, in fact they led the charge. See any top republicans blowing them away? Rhetorically, I mean.
5
posted on
02/19/2006 7:10:40 AM PST
by
Williams
To: roostercogburn
This story is still around?
To: roostercogburn
And they wonder why their circulation is down, and they are firing employees. This story will boost profits. s/off
7
posted on
02/19/2006 7:11:26 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: roostercogburn
"Dick Cheney has never been your normal politician. He has never seemed as eager to please, as needy for votes and approval and headlines as, say, Bill Clinton."
and this is a bad thing? yes, to the loony left it is.
8
posted on
02/19/2006 7:11:45 AM PST
by
socialismisinsidious
(Liberals are all about choice UNTIL you choose differently than them.)
To: roostercogburn
Newsweek ^ | Feb. 27, 2006 | Isikoff & Clift. Consider the source ... no bias here!
9
posted on
02/19/2006 7:12:05 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: roostercogburn
Inside Dick Cheney's dark, secretive mind-setand the forces that made it that way. ----
*****
Alan Simpson addressed this subject perfectly on FoxNews this morning........
Simpson:. "All you get is "controversy, crap and confusion" from the media."
Don't miss Simpson on this.
10
posted on
02/19/2006 7:12:06 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Alan Simpson: all you get is "controversy, crap and confusion" from the media)
To: roostercogburn
C'mon. This isn't a bad article and does not necessarily reflect poorly on VP Cheney. I thought it presented Cheney's personality and leadership style quite accurately. And it did bring up a very interesting point: why did he not talk to President Bush (his BOSS, for cryin' out loud) for 36 hours? At face value that raises a red flag to me. Something is wrong between them.
11
posted on
02/19/2006 7:13:22 AM PST
by
manwiththehands
(Repeal the 17th Amendment. NOW.)
To: roostercogburn
I'm old enough to remember when Newsweek was a respected publication, and not another National Enquirer. I guess when your target audience becomes those that read at the 7th grade level...that is what you become.
12
posted on
02/19/2006 7:16:11 AM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: manwiththehands
C'mon. This isn't a bad article and does not necessarily reflect poorly on VP Cheney. I thought it presented Cheney's personality and leadership style quite accurately.So, you think a description of a "dark, secretive mind" is accurate and is a fair and somewhat positive description?
13
posted on
02/19/2006 7:16:43 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Last Dakotan
Let them overplay this. To any dispassionate observer they come out looking like the fools they are.<<
U know....I think you're right! Between this and the Alito hearings...I have a few liberal friends that are "just starting to see the light"
14
posted on
02/19/2006 7:17:53 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: roostercogburn; aculeus; hellinahandcart; Constitution Day; Petronski; Thinkin' Gal; ...
Inside Dick Cheney's dark, secretive mind-setand the forces that made it that way.Evan Thomas and his cast of thousands* are gunning for a Bulwer-Lytton.
* Michael Isikoff, Daniel Klaidman, Richard Wolffe, Holly Bailey, Mark Hosenball, Eleanor Clift, Carol Rust. Why so many to write half a dozen pages?
15
posted on
02/19/2006 7:18:12 AM PST
by
dighton
To: manwiththehands
The article is crap. It is written from the viewpoint that Cheney is always wrong. That he is too conservative.
To: roostercogburn
Newsweek's idea of saving a tree. Beat a dead horse into pulp, then make paper out of it. Just doing their part to Save the Planet...
To: roostercogburn
It's not just this story. They've got a whole matrix of anti-Cheney stories out there, all with this "Heart of Darkness" ring to them. What a bunch of shameless ninnies!
18
posted on
02/19/2006 7:22:50 AM PST
by
claudiustg
(Delenda est Iran!)
To: roostercogburn
Why didn't they write a story to explore the dark, perverted mind of Bill Clinton?How about Hillary------Among her recent quotes:
"I predict this administration will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country."
"When you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, [it's] like a plantation. And you know what I'm talking about."
"Contrary to
Franklin Roosevelt, who had nothing to fear but fear itself, this [GOP] crowd is all: '[What] we got is fear, and we're going to keep playing the fear card.' "
19
posted on
02/19/2006 7:24:58 AM PST
by
yoe
To: roostercogburn
Looks like Newsweek decided not to spike this Isikoff article like they did with the Clinton-Lewinsky news.
Let them continue to beat this dead horse. It's just further proof of how far they are removed from reality.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson