Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firm sues to block foreign port takeover
AP/seattlepi ^ | February 18, 2006 | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 02/18/2006 6:55:19 PM PST by ncountylee

WASHINGTON -- A company at the Port of Miami has sued to block the takeover of shipping operations there by a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates. It is the first American courtroom effort to capsize a $6.8 billion sale already embroiled in a national debate over security risks at six major U.S. ports affected by the deal.

The Miami company, a subsidiary of Eller & Company Inc., presently is a business partner with London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., which Dubai Ports World purchased last week. In a lawsuit in Florida circuit court, the Miami subsidiary said that under the sale it will become an "involuntary partner" with Dubai's government and it may seek more than $10 million in damages.

The Miami subsidiary, Continental Stevedoring & Terminals Inc., said the sale to Dubai was prohibited under its partnership agreement with the British firm and "may endanger the national security of the United States." It asked a judge to block the takeover and said it does not believe the company, Florida or the U.S. government can ensure Dubai Ports World's compliance with American security rules.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; miami; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Txsleuth

I hope many more Republicans (and Americans) will be questioning this.

The national security problem is specifically emphasized by this Miami port company. They should know what's involved better than most people, I would think.


41 posted on 02/18/2006 9:24:35 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I have no doubt that they will...

I saw Ilena Ros-Lehtinen, a Rep from Florida today..and she is a Republican..and very well respected by Bush from what I have heard...and SHE was adamant about stopping this.


42 posted on 02/18/2006 9:27:42 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Good news!

We may yet have the country a little longer. :)


43 posted on 02/18/2006 9:32:40 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: All

"DP World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry"


quote from Washington Post article

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/11/AR2006021101112.html


(the word "secretive" seemed needful of a post)


44 posted on 02/18/2006 9:48:24 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
With 23 terrorists on the loose thanks last week thanks to Yemen. All states are to be scrutinized, including Dubai.

And since when does our government have the right to turn it it's port controll over to another government? I'm sure it's violating the constitution somewhere, just as a ton of other treaty derived sovernty give-aways probably do.

This is freakin crazy if this deal goes down, and we should be "putting the wood" to anyone on record for giving it the go ahead. I don't care how conservative (or pseudo-conservative) the pigs are.

45 posted on 02/18/2006 10:10:06 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

Thanks for an intelligent post. I agree with every word.


46 posted on 02/18/2006 10:52:20 PM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

"If the British Company can't sell to Dubai/UAE....they COULD sell to a Chinese firm..."

Why not Hamas? That is the exact point I wanted to make. Before we let capitalism with strategic points of interest, I would think our administration and lawmakers would want to look at this deal carefully. It would be like:
Hitler pre-1941: "What's the problem? Its a bona fide offer? Besides who else wants to regulate the English Channel?
British Statesman: "Well, he has a point. And it is a contract. Tell you what Adolph, we will send it to the Commons and see what they say."


47 posted on 02/19/2006 8:38:09 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

The British Company SOLD to the Dubai group...WE don't get the choice between the two..

Isn't there some law to regulate this?


48 posted on 02/19/2006 8:41:07 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

"The port contract was already foreign-run, so the headline is false on its face. And this suit is against the British company and is purely a matter of contract law."

Not true according to the article.


"....may endanger the national security of the United States." It asked a judge to block the takeover and said it does not believe the company, Florida or the U.S. government can ensure Dubai Ports World's compliance with American security rules."

Reads like CS T offered much more than a simple contract violation to the judge as a reason to stop the sale.


49 posted on 02/19/2006 8:54:44 AM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

It's typical to throw everything, including the kitchen sink, into any complaint filed in a lawsuit. I don't think a Florida circuit court even has jurisdiction to hear that part of the allegation.


50 posted on 02/19/2006 9:00:32 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
but this is clearly a contract case and nothing more.

Not entirely.

The committee earlier agreed to consider concerns about the deal as expressed by a Miami-based company, Eller & Co., according to Eller's lawyer, Michael Kreitzer. Eller is a business partner with the British shipping giant but was not in the running to buy the ports company.

Dubai firm set to take charge of 6 U.S. ports

51 posted on 02/19/2006 9:01:00 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Again, I was talking specifically about this lawsuit, not the overall policy decision or whether national security implications had been considered by anyone before the decision was made.

If this company has grounds to block the suit based on its partnership agreement with the British firm, a preferential right to purchase for example, or some requirement that its consent to the sale must first be obtained, that's fine. That's contract law.

52 posted on 02/19/2006 9:14:24 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I have been on the Sunday Talk show thread all day...and this subject is very much a part of that thread...

I couldn't possibly repeat all of the great posts..or even post the dozens of links with articles about this subject.

Would you like me to ping you to that thread? I bet if you took the time to skim that thread, you will find a lot that will help you a LOT more than I can...

I have been learning a lot about this...

Let me know...okay?


53 posted on 02/19/2006 11:18:28 AM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

A: Handover of the Panama Canal and American Ports to our enemies.

Q: What are a couple of really stupid American sellouts of Naitonal Security the last 2 decades?


54 posted on 02/19/2006 11:21:19 AM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoNotDivide
Correct. Unfortunately that is just the external.
55 posted on 02/19/2006 1:07:25 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Did you see this?
56 posted on 02/19/2006 4:13:24 PM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DoNotDivide
Believe it or not, found that article while also reading this FR thread/article Brit Hume: Bush Will Reverse Ports Decision.

I'll say again the "port sale" and "the appointment of DU Exec" = smells!
57 posted on 02/19/2006 4:17:59 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Yes, it doesn't even approach passing the stinky diaper test.


58 posted on 02/19/2006 4:19:06 PM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
Check this out:

"Last month, the White House appointed a senior DP World executive, David C. Sanborn of Virginia, to be the new administrator of the Maritime Administration of the Transportation Department. Sanborn worked as DP World's director of operations for Europe and Latin America."
59 posted on 02/19/2006 5:46:07 PM PST by stylin19a (quoting the commerce department)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Thanks. I'm reading more about it now on the other threads.


60 posted on 02/19/2006 9:19:44 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson